FEDERAL · 7 U.S.C. · Chapter 1
Omitted
7 U.S.C. § 15
This text of 7 U.S.C. § 15 (Omitted) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
7 U.S.C. § 15.
Text
Omitted
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.
484 U.S. 97 (Supreme Court, 1987)
Shapiro v. United States
335 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1948)
Leist v. Simplot
638 F.2d 283 (Second Circuit, 1980)
Stanley Greenwood v. Thomas H. Dittmer, Ray E. Friedman & Company, Stanley Greenwood v. Thomas H. Dittmer, Ray E. Friedman & Company
776 F.2d 785 (Eighth Circuit, 1985)
In the Matter of an Application to Enforce an Administrative Subpoena of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Naji Robert Nahas
738 F.2d 487 (D.C. Circuit, 1984)
Silverman v. Berkson
661 A.2d 1266 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1995)
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Worth Bullion Group, Inc.
717 F.3d 545 (Seventh Circuit, 2013)
George F. Frey, Jr., and Edward A. Cox, Jr., Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee v. The Commodity Exchange Authority
547 F.2d 46 (Seventh Circuit, 1977)
Collins v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
737 F. Supp. 1467 (N.D. Illinois, 1990)
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, Applicant-Appellee, v. Richard W. TOKHEIM, Respondent-Appellant
153 F.3d 474 (Seventh Circuit, 1998)
Ping He (Hai Nam) Co. v. Nonferrous Metals (U.S.A.) Inc.
22 F. Supp. 2d 94 (S.D. New York, 1998)
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Harker
615 F. Supp. 420 (District of Columbia, 1985)
United States v. Tobins
512 F. Supp. 308 (D. Massachusetts, 1981)
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Nahas
580 F. Supp. 245 (District of Columbia, 1983)
United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Hunter Wise Commodities, LLC
1 F. Supp. 3d 1311 (S.D. Florida, 2014)
AVCO Financial Corp. v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
929 F. Supp. 714 (S.D. New York, 1996)
Petzoldt v. Glickman
983 F. Supp. 873 (E.D. Missouri, 1997)
(PS) Koto v. Positive Investments Inc.
(E.D. California, 2025)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Codification
Section, act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 369, §6(c) (part), formerly §6(b), 42 Stat. 1002, as amended and renumbered, which related to enforcement powers of Commission, was omitted in the general amendment of section 6(c) of act Sept. 21, 1922, by Pub. L. 111–203, title VII, §753(a), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1750. Section 6(c) is now classified to section 9 of this title.
Codification
Section, act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 369, §6(c) (part), formerly §6(b), 42 Stat. 1002, as amended and renumbered, which related to enforcement powers of Commission, was omitted in the general amendment of section 6(c) of act Sept. 21, 1922, by Pub. L. 111–203, title VII, §753(a), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1750. Section 6(c) is now classified to section 9 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
7 U.S.C. § 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/7/15.