FEDERAL · 7 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—ENVIRONMENTAL PESTICIDE CONTROL

Authority of States

7 U.S.C. § 136v
Title7Agriculture
ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—ENVIRONMENTAL PESTICIDE CONTROL

This text of 7 U.S.C. § 136v (Authority of States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
7 U.S.C. § 136v.

Text

(a)In general A State may regulate the sale or use of any federally registered pesticide or device in the State, but only if and to the extent the regulation does not permit any sale or use prohibited by this subchapter.
(b)Uniformity Such State shall not impose or continue in effect any requirements for labeling or packaging in addition to or different from those required under this subchapter.
(c)Additional uses
(1)A State may provide registration for additional uses of federally registered pesticides formulated for distribution and use within that State to meet special local needs in accord with the purposes of this subchapter and if registration for such use has not previously been denied, disapproved, or canceled by the Administrator. Such registration shall be deemed registration

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Richard Leander Ferebee, Jr. v. Chevron Chemical Company
736 F.2d 1529 (D.C. Circuit, 1984)
271 case citations
City of Columbus v. Ours Garage & Wrecker Service, Inc.
536 U.S. 424 (Supreme Court, 2002)
268 case citations
Etcheverry v. Tri-Ag Serv., Inc.
993 P.2d 366 (California Supreme Court, 2000)
78 case citations
Jenkins v. Amchem Products, Inc.
886 P.2d 869 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1994)
74 case citations
Sleath v. West Mont Home Health Services, Inc.
2000 MT 381 (Montana Supreme Court, 2000)
45 case citations
Anderson v. State, Department of Natural Resources
693 N.W.2d 181 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2005)
37 case citations
Burke v. Dow Chemical Co.
797 F. Supp. 1128 (E.D. New York, 1992)
34 case citations
Dawn-Marie Hawkins James E. Hawkins v. Leslie's Pool Mart, Inc
184 F.3d 244 (Third Circuit, 1999)
34 case citations
Taylor AG Industries v. Pure-Gro
54 F.3d 555 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)
33 case citations
Stucky v. City of San Antonio
260 F.3d 424 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)
30 case citations
Higgins v. Monsanto Co.
862 F. Supp. 751 (N.D. New York, 1994)
29 case citations
In Re StarLink Corn Products Liability Litigation
212 F. Supp. 2d 828 (N.D. Illinois, 2002)
24 case citations
MacIas v. State of California
897 P.2d 530 (California Supreme Court, 1995)
24 case citations
Goodwin v. Bacon
896 P.2d 673 (Washington Supreme Court, 1995)
23 case citations
Davidson v. Velsicol Chemical Corp.
834 P.2d 931 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1992)
22 case citations
Indian Brand Farms, Inc. v. Novartis Crop Protection Inc.
617 F.3d 207 (Third Circuit, 2010)
22 case citations
Ackerman v. American Cyanamid Co.
586 N.W.2d 208 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1998)
21 case citations
Sowers v. Johnson & Johnson Medical, Inc.
867 F. Supp. 306 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1994)
19 case citations
Central Maine Power Co. v. Town of Lebanon
571 A.2d 1189 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1990)
16 case citations

Source Credit

History

(June 25, 1947, ch. 125, §24, as added Pub. L. 92–516, §2, Oct. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 997; amended Pub. L. 95–396, §22, Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 835; Pub. L. 100–532, title VIII, §801(m), Oct. 25, 1988, 102 Stat. 2682.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

References in Text
The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, referred to in subsec. (c)(3), is act June 25, 1938, ch. 675, 52 Stat. 1040, which is classified generally to chapter 9 (§301 et seq.) of Title 21, Food and Drugs. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 301 of Title 21 and Tables.

Amendments
1988—Pub. L. 100–532, §801(m), inserted headings for subsecs. (a) to (c) and realigned margins of pars. (1) to (4) of subsec. (c).
1978—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 95–396 inserted "federally registered" before "pesticide or device".
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 95–396 substituted "labeling or packaging" and "required under" for "labeling and packaging" and "required pursuant to", respectively.
Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 95–396 incorporated existing text in provisions designated par. (1) and substituted "registration for additional uses of federally registered pesticides" for "registration for pesticides".
Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 95–396 incorporated existing text in provisions designated par. (2), conditioned disapproval of registration on communication of intention to disapprove and reasons for disapproval and provision for time to respond, and restricted authority of Administrator to prohibit or disapprove a State registration.
Subsec. (c)(3). Pub. L. 95–396 added par. (3).
Subsec. (c)(4). Pub. L. 95–396 incorporated existing text in provisions designated par. (4) and authorized suspension of registration authority of the State based on findings of inability or failure to exercise adequate controls following an indication of intention to suspend and reasons for the suspension and provision for time to respond.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1988 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 100–532 effective on expiration of 60 days after Oct. 25, 1988, see section 901 of Pub. L. 100–532, set out as a note under section 136 of this title.

Effective Date
For effective date of section, see section 4 of Pub. L. 92–516, set out as a note under section 136 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 U.S.C. § 136v, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/7/136v.