FEDERAL · 7 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—LOANS, PARITY PAYMENTS, CONSUMER SAFEGUARDS, MARKETING QUOTAS, AND MARKETING CERTIFICATES

Court review

7 U.S.C. § 1366
Title7Agriculture
ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—LOANS, PARITY PAYMENTS, CONSUMER SAFEGUARDS, MARKETING QUOTAS, AND MARKETING CERTIFICATES
Partsubpart i—publication and review of quotas

This text of 7 U.S.C. § 1366 (Court review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
7 U.S.C. § 1366.

Text

The review by the court shall be limited to questions of law, and the findings of fact by the review committee, if supported by evidence shall be conclusive. If application is made to the court for leave to adduce additional evidence, and it is shown to the satisfaction of the court that such additional evidence is material and that there were reasonable grounds for failure to adduce such evidence in the hearing before the review committee, the court may direct such additional evidence to be taken before the review committee in such manner and upon such terms and conditions as to the court may seem proper. The review committee may modify its findings of fact or its determination by reason of the additional evidence so taken, and it shall file with the court such modified findings or determ

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morrow v. Clayton
326 F.2d 36 (Tenth Circuit, 1963)
19 case citations
Crolley v. Tatton
249 F.2d 908 (Fifth Circuit, 1957)
17 case citations
Corpstein v. United States
262 F.2d 200 (Tenth Circuit, 1958)
16 case citations
Thomas v. County Office Committee of Cameron County
327 F. Supp. 1244 (S.D. Texas, 1971)
14 case citations
Fred Chandler, Sr. v. W. Lewis David
350 F.2d 669 (Fifth Circuit, 1965)
14 case citations
Lee v. Roseberry
94 F. Supp. 324 (E.D. Kentucky, 1950)
14 case citations
Luke v. Review Committee
155 F. Supp. 719 (W.D. Louisiana, 1957)
13 case citations
Lee v. DeBERRY
65 S.E.2d 775 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1951)
13 case citations
United States v. C. E. Sykes
310 F.2d 417 (Fifth Circuit, 1962)
10 case citations
Dighton v. Coffman
178 F. Supp. 114 (E.D. Illinois, 1959)
10 case citations
Jones v. Hughes
400 F.2d 585 (Eighth Circuit, 1968)
9 case citations
Williamson v. Holland
232 F. Supp. 479 (E.D. North Carolina, 1963)
9 case citations
Smith Land Co. v. Christensen
148 F.2d 184 (Tenth Circuit, 1945)
9 case citations
Yee Gwing Mee v. Acheson
108 F. Supp. 502 (N.D. California, 1952)
9 case citations
Graham v. Lawrimore
185 F. Supp. 761 (E.D. South Carolina, 1960)
8 case citations
Moe v. Wesen
172 F. Supp. 259 (D. Montana, 1959)
6 case citations
Larkin v. Roseberry
54 F. Supp. 373 (E.D. Kentucky, 1944)
6 case citations
Gladney v. Review Committee
257 F. Supp. 57 (W.D. Louisiana, 1966)
5 case citations
Hart v. Hassell
250 F. Supp. 893 (E.D. North Carolina, 1966)
5 case citations
Hollstein v. Nebraska State Marketing Quota Review Committee
179 F. Supp. 657 (D. Nebraska, 1959)
5 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title III, §366, 52 Stat. 63; Pub. L. 98–620, title IV, §402(6), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3357.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1984—Pub. L. 98–620 substituted "The court" for "At the earliest convenient time, the court, in term time or vacation,".

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–620 not applicable to cases pending on Nov. 8, 1984, see section 403 of Pub. L. 98–620, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1657 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 U.S.C. § 1366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/7/1366.