FEDERAL · 7 U.S.C. · Chapter 35

Institution of proceeding for court review of committee findings

Current through Pub. L. 119-102
Title 7Agriculture·Ch. 35 — AGRICULTURAL ADJUSTMENT ACT OF 1938·Subch. II·Pt. C
If the farmer is dissatisfied with the determination of the review committee, he may, within fifteen days after a notice of such determination is mailed to him by registered mail or by certified mail, file a bill in equity against the review committee as defendant in the United States district court, or institute proceedings for review in any court of record of the State having general jurisdiction, sitting in the county or the district in which his farm is located, for the purpose of obtaining a review of such determination. Bond shall be given in an amount and with surety satisfactory to the court to secure the United States for the costs of the proceeding. The bill of complaint in such proceeding may be served by delivering a copy thereof to any one of the members of the review committe

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

7 U.S.C. § 1365 (Institution of proceeding for court review of committee findings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sicinski v. Reliance Funding Corp.
461 F. Supp. 649 (S.D. New York, 1978)
26 case citations
S. B. Allen v. W. Lewis David
334 F.2d 592 (Fifth Circuit, 1964)
20 case citations
McConnell v. Marine Engineers Beneficial Ass'n Benefit Plans, District 1
526 F. Supp. 770 (N.D. California, 1981)
18 case citations
Crolley v. Tatton
249 F.2d 908 (Fifth Circuit, 1957)
17 case citations
Dow Chemical Co. v. Ebling
723 N.E.2d 881 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2000)
16 case citations
Thomas v. County Office Committee of Cameron County
327 F. Supp. 1244 (S.D. Texas, 1971)
14 case citations
Fred Chandler, Sr. v. W. Lewis David
350 F.2d 669 (Fifth Circuit, 1965)
14 case citations
Austin v. Jackson
353 F.2d 910 (Fourth Circuit, 1965)
12 case citations
Davis v. Joyner
240 F. Supp. 689 (E.D. North Carolina, 1964)
12 case citations
Raines v. Block
798 F.2d 377 (Tenth Circuit, 1986)
11 case citations
MacE v. BERRY
81 S.E.2d 276 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1954)
11 case citations
United States v. C. E. Sykes
310 F.2d 417 (Fifth Circuit, 1962)
10 case citations
United States v. Lillard
143 F. Supp. 113 (W.D. Missouri, 1956)
10 case citations
Dighton v. Coffman
178 F. Supp. 114 (E.D. Illinois, 1959)
10 case citations
Williamson v. Holland
232 F. Supp. 479 (E.D. North Carolina, 1963)
9 case citations
Smith Land Co. v. Christensen
148 F.2d 184 (Tenth Circuit, 1945)
9 case citations
United States v. Warren M. Jeffcoat
272 F.2d 266 (Fourth Circuit, 1959)
6 case citations
Gladney v. Review Committee
257 F. Supp. 57 (W.D. Louisiana, 1966)
5 case citations
Hayes v. National Con-Serv, Inc.
523 F. Supp. 1034 (D. Maryland, 1981)
5 case citations
Raines v. Block
599 F. Supp. 196 (D. Colorado, 1984)
5 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title III, §365, 52 Stat. 63; Pub. L. 86–507, §1(5), June 11, 1960, 74 Stat. 200.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1960—Pub. L. 86–507 inserted "or by certified mail" after "registered mail".