FEDERAL · 7 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—LOANS, PARITY PAYMENTS, CONSUMER SAFEGUARDS, MARKETING QUOTAS, AND MARKETING CERTIFICATES
Institution of proceeding for court review of committee findings
7 U.S.C. § 1365
Title7 — Agriculture
ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—LOANS, PARITY PAYMENTS, CONSUMER SAFEGUARDS, MARKETING QUOTAS, AND MARKETING CERTIFICATES
Partsubpart i—publication and review of quotas
This text of 7 U.S.C. § 1365 (Institution of proceeding for court review of committee findings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
7 U.S.C. § 1365.
Text
If the farmer is dissatisfied with the determination of the review committee, he may, within fifteen days after a notice of such determination is mailed to him by registered mail or by certified mail, file a bill in equity against the review committee as defendant in the United States district court, or institute proceedings for review in any court of record of the State having general jurisdiction, sitting in the county or the district in which his farm is located, for the purpose of obtaining a review of such determination. Bond shall be given in an amount and with surety satisfactory to the court to secure the United States for the costs of the proceeding. The bill of complaint in such proceeding may be served by delivering a copy thereof to any one of the members of the review committe
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sicinski v. Reliance Funding Corp.
461 F. Supp. 649 (S.D. New York, 1978)
S. B. Allen v. W. Lewis David
334 F.2d 592 (Fifth Circuit, 1964)
McConnell v. Marine Engineers Beneficial Ass'n Benefit Plans, District 1
526 F. Supp. 770 (N.D. California, 1981)
Crolley v. Tatton
249 F.2d 908 (Fifth Circuit, 1957)
Dow Chemical Co. v. Ebling
723 N.E.2d 881 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2000)
Thomas v. County Office Committee of Cameron County
327 F. Supp. 1244 (S.D. Texas, 1971)
Fred Chandler, Sr. v. W. Lewis David
350 F.2d 669 (Fifth Circuit, 1965)
Austin v. Jackson
353 F.2d 910 (Fourth Circuit, 1965)
Davis v. Joyner
240 F. Supp. 689 (E.D. North Carolina, 1964)
Raines v. Block
798 F.2d 377 (Tenth Circuit, 1986)
MacE v. BERRY
81 S.E.2d 276 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1954)
United States v. C. E. Sykes
310 F.2d 417 (Fifth Circuit, 1962)
United States v. Lillard
143 F. Supp. 113 (W.D. Missouri, 1956)
Dighton v. Coffman
178 F. Supp. 114 (E.D. Illinois, 1959)
Williamson v. Holland
232 F. Supp. 479 (E.D. North Carolina, 1963)
Smith Land Co. v. Christensen
148 F.2d 184 (Tenth Circuit, 1945)
United States v. Warren M. Jeffcoat
272 F.2d 266 (Fourth Circuit, 1959)
Gladney v. Review Committee
257 F. Supp. 57 (W.D. Louisiana, 1966)
Hayes v. National Con-Serv, Inc.
523 F. Supp. 1034 (D. Maryland, 1981)
Raines v. Block
599 F. Supp. 196 (D. Colorado, 1984)
Source Credit
History
(Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title III, §365, 52 Stat. 63; Pub. L. 86–507, §1(5), June 11, 1960, 74 Stat. 200.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1960—Pub. L. 86–507 inserted "or by certified mail" after "registered mail".
Amendments
1960—Pub. L. 86–507 inserted "or by certified mail" after "registered mail".
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
7 U.S.C. § 1365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/7/1365.