FEDERAL · 7 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—LOANS, PARITY PAYMENTS, CONSUMER SAFEGUARDS, MARKETING QUOTAS, AND MARKETING CERTIFICATES
Review of quota; review committee
7 U.S.C. § 1363
Title7 — Agriculture
ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—LOANS, PARITY PAYMENTS, CONSUMER SAFEGUARDS, MARKETING QUOTAS, AND MARKETING CERTIFICATES
Partsubpart i—publication and review of quotas
This text of 7 U.S.C. § 1363 (Review of quota; review committee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
7 U.S.C. § 1363.
Text
Any farmer who is dissatisfied with his farm marketing quota may, within fifteen days after mailing to him of notice as provided in section 1362 of this title, have such quota reviewed by a local review committee composed of three farmers from the same or nearby counties appointed by the Secretary. Such committee shall not include any member of the local committee which determined the farm acreage allotment, the normal yield, or the farm marketing quota for such farm. Unless application for review is made within such period, the original determination of the farm marketing quota shall be final.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Garvey v. Freeman
397 F.2d 600 (Tenth Circuit, 1968)
Walter J. Miller v. United States
242 F.2d 392 (Sixth Circuit, 1957)
J. T. Fulford v. Jesse v. B. Forman, Elmer G. Gardner and Murphey W. Luna
245 F.2d 145 (Fifth Circuit, 1957)
United States v. Henry Kissinger
250 F.2d 940 (Third Circuit, 1958)
Crolley v. Tatton
249 F.2d 908 (Fifth Circuit, 1957)
Thomas v. County Office Committee of Cameron County
327 F. Supp. 1244 (S.D. Texas, 1971)
Fred Chandler, Sr. v. W. Lewis David
350 F.2d 669 (Fifth Circuit, 1965)
Luke v. Review Committee
155 F. Supp. 719 (W.D. Louisiana, 1957)
United States v. C. E. Sykes
310 F.2d 417 (Fifth Circuit, 1962)
United States v. Lillard
143 F. Supp. 113 (W.D. Missouri, 1956)
Williamson v. Holland
232 F. Supp. 479 (E.D. North Carolina, 1963)
United States v. Stangland
137 F. Supp. 539 (N.D. Indiana, 1956)
Gladney v. Review Committee
257 F. Supp. 57 (W.D. Louisiana, 1966)
Hart v. Hassell
250 F. Supp. 893 (E.D. North Carolina, 1966)
Simpson v. Laprade
248 F. Supp. 399 (W.D. Virginia, 1965)
Schild v. Busch
293 F. Supp. 1353 (S.D. Texas, 1968)
United States v. Harvey
131 F. Supp. 493 (N.D. Texas, 1954)
Fulford v. Forman
144 F. Supp. 536 (S.D. Texas, 1956)
Phillips v. Simpson
353 F. Supp. 1139 (E.D. Kentucky, 1973)
Jilka v. Mickley
348 F.2d 154 (Tenth Circuit, 1965)
Source Credit
History
(Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title III, §363, 52 Stat. 63; Apr. 12, 1951, ch. 28, §3, 65 Stat. 31.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1951—Act Apr. 12, 1951, provided that the Secretary appoint a local review committee composed of 3 farmers from the same or nearby counties.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Review of 1950 Cotton Farm Acreage Allotment
Act Mar. 31, 1950, ch. 81, §2, 64 Stat. 41, provided that any farmer dissatisfied with his farm acreage allotment for the 1950 cotton crop could have such allotment reviewed in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.
Amendments
1951—Act Apr. 12, 1951, provided that the Secretary appoint a local review committee composed of 3 farmers from the same or nearby counties.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Review of 1950 Cotton Farm Acreage Allotment
Act Mar. 31, 1950, ch. 81, §2, 64 Stat. 41, provided that any farmer dissatisfied with his farm acreage allotment for the 1950 cotton crop could have such allotment reviewed in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
7 U.S.C. § 1363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/7/1363.