FEDERAL · 7 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—LOANS, PARITY PAYMENTS, CONSUMER SAFEGUARDS, MARKETING QUOTAS, AND MARKETING CERTIFICATES

Review of quota; review committee

7 U.S.C. § 1363
Title7Agriculture
ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—LOANS, PARITY PAYMENTS, CONSUMER SAFEGUARDS, MARKETING QUOTAS, AND MARKETING CERTIFICATES
Partsubpart i—publication and review of quotas

This text of 7 U.S.C. § 1363 (Review of quota; review committee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
7 U.S.C. § 1363.

Text

Any farmer who is dissatisfied with his farm marketing quota may, within fifteen days after mailing to him of notice as provided in section 1362 of this title, have such quota reviewed by a local review committee composed of three farmers from the same or nearby counties appointed by the Secretary. Such committee shall not include any member of the local committee which determined the farm acreage allotment, the normal yield, or the farm marketing quota for such farm. Unless application for review is made within such period, the original determination of the farm marketing quota shall be final.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garvey v. Freeman
397 F.2d 600 (Tenth Circuit, 1968)
46 case citations
Walter J. Miller v. United States
242 F.2d 392 (Sixth Circuit, 1957)
31 case citations
J. T. Fulford v. Jesse v. B. Forman, Elmer G. Gardner and Murphey W. Luna
245 F.2d 145 (Fifth Circuit, 1957)
29 case citations
United States v. Henry Kissinger
250 F.2d 940 (Third Circuit, 1958)
24 case citations
Crolley v. Tatton
249 F.2d 908 (Fifth Circuit, 1957)
17 case citations
Thomas v. County Office Committee of Cameron County
327 F. Supp. 1244 (S.D. Texas, 1971)
14 case citations
Fred Chandler, Sr. v. W. Lewis David
350 F.2d 669 (Fifth Circuit, 1965)
14 case citations
Luke v. Review Committee
155 F. Supp. 719 (W.D. Louisiana, 1957)
13 case citations
United States v. C. E. Sykes
310 F.2d 417 (Fifth Circuit, 1962)
10 case citations
United States v. Lillard
143 F. Supp. 113 (W.D. Missouri, 1956)
10 case citations
Williamson v. Holland
232 F. Supp. 479 (E.D. North Carolina, 1963)
9 case citations
United States v. Stangland
137 F. Supp. 539 (N.D. Indiana, 1956)
7 case citations
Gladney v. Review Committee
257 F. Supp. 57 (W.D. Louisiana, 1966)
5 case citations
Hart v. Hassell
250 F. Supp. 893 (E.D. North Carolina, 1966)
5 case citations
Simpson v. Laprade
248 F. Supp. 399 (W.D. Virginia, 1965)
4 case citations
Schild v. Busch
293 F. Supp. 1353 (S.D. Texas, 1968)
4 case citations
United States v. Harvey
131 F. Supp. 493 (N.D. Texas, 1954)
4 case citations
Fulford v. Forman
144 F. Supp. 536 (S.D. Texas, 1956)
3 case citations
Phillips v. Simpson
353 F. Supp. 1139 (E.D. Kentucky, 1973)
2 case citations
Jilka v. Mickley
348 F.2d 154 (Tenth Circuit, 1965)
2 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title III, §363, 52 Stat. 63; Apr. 12, 1951, ch. 28, §3, 65 Stat. 31.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1951—Act Apr. 12, 1951, provided that the Secretary appoint a local review committee composed of 3 farmers from the same or nearby counties.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Review of 1950 Cotton Farm Acreage Allotment
Act Mar. 31, 1950, ch. 81, §2, 64 Stat. 41, provided that any farmer dissatisfied with his farm acreage allotment for the 1950 cotton crop could have such allotment reviewed in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 U.S.C. § 1363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/7/1363.