FEDERAL · 50 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE

Criminal sanctions

50 U.S.C. § 1809
Title50War and National Defense
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE

This text of 50 U.S.C. § 1809 (Criminal sanctions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
50 U.S.C. § 1809.

Text

(a)Prohibited activities A person is guilty of an offense if he—
(1)intentionally engages in electronic surveillance under color of law except as authorized by this chapter, chapter 119, 121, or 206 of title 18, or any express statutory authorization that is an additional exclusive means for conducting electronic surveillance under section 1812 of this title;
(2)intentionally discloses or uses information obtained under color of law by electronic surveillance, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through electronic surveillance not authorized by this chapter, chapter 119, 121, or 206 of title 18, or any express statutory authorization that is an additional exclusive means for conducting electronic surveillance under section 1812 of this title; or
(3)knowin

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

American Civil Liberties Union v. National Security Agency
493 F.3d 644 (Sixth Circuit, 2007)
122 case citations
United States v. Alejandrina Torres
751 F.2d 875 (Seventh Circuit, 1985)
116 case citations
Brian Iverson v. United States
973 F.3d 843 (Eighth Circuit, 2020)
51 case citations
United States v. Koyomejian
946 F.2d 1450 (Ninth Circuit, 1991)
24 case citations
Pellegrino v. U.S. Transp. SEC. Admin.
896 F.3d 207 (Third Circuit, 2018)
14 case citations
Wikimedia Foundation v. NSA/CSS
14 F.4th 276 (Fourth Circuit, 2021)
14 case citations
Michele Leuthauser v. USA
71 F.4th 1189 (Ninth Circuit, 2023)
7 case citations
Mengert v. United States
120 F.4th 696 (Tenth Circuit, 2024)
5 case citations
Carter Page v. James Comey
137 F.4th 806 (D.C. Circuit, 2025)
3 case citations
United States v. Wanis Koyomejian
946 F.2d 1450 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
3 case citations
United States v. Muhtorov
187 F. Supp. 3d 1240 (D. Colorado, 2015)
3 case citations
Electronic Frontier Foundation v. Department of Justice
141 F. Supp. 3d 51 (District of Columbia, 2015)
1 case citations
Fazaga v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
885 F. Supp. 2d 978 (C.D. California, 2012)
1 case citations
Gill v. Department of Justice
(District of Columbia, 2016)
Yassir Fazaga v. Fbi
(Ninth Circuit, 2020)
Page v. Comey
(District of Columbia, 2022)
Elisabeth Koletas v. United States
(Eleventh Circuit, 2025)

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 95–511, title I, §109, Oct. 25, 1978, 92 Stat. 1796; Pub. L. 110–261, title I, §102(b), July 10, 2008, 122 Stat. 2459; Pub. L. 111–259, title VIII, §801(3), Oct. 7, 2010, 124 Stat. 2746; Pub. L. 118–49, §13(a), (b), Apr. 20, 2024, 138 Stat. 881.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

References in Text
This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 95–511, Oct. 25, 1978, 92 Stat. 1783, known as the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1801 of this title and Tables.

Amendments
2024—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 118–49, §13(a)(1)(A), struck out "intentionally" after "if he" in introductory provisions.
Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 118–49, §13(a)(1)(B)(ii), which directed the substitution of a semicolon for "; or", could not be executed because the word "or" did not appear.
Pub. L. 118–49, §13(a)(1)(B)(i), inserted "intentionally" before "engages in".
Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 118–49, §13(a)(1)(C)(i), which directed the substitution of "intentionally discloses" for "disclose", was executed by making the substitution for "discloses" to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 118–49, §13(a)(1)(C)(ii), (D), added par. (3).
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 118–49, §13(a)(2), substituted "under paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (a)" for "under subsection (a)".
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 118–49, §13(b), amended subsec. (c) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "An offense described in this section is punishable by a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment for not more than five years, or both."
2010—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 111–259, §801(3)(A), substituted "section 1812 of this title;" for "section 1812 of this title.;".
Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 111–259, §801(3)(B), substituted "title." for "title.."
2008—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 110–261 substituted "authorized by this chapter, chapter 119, 121, or 206 of title 18, or any express statutory authorization that is an additional exclusive means for conducting electronic surveillance under section 1812 of this title." for "authorized by statute" in pars. (1) and (2).

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2008 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 110–261 effective July 10, 2008, except as provided in section 404 of Pub. L. 110–261, set out as a Transition Procedures note under section 1801 of this title, see section 402 of Pub. L. 110–261, set out as an Effective Date of 2008 Amendment note under section 1801 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 U.S.C. § 1809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/50/1809.