FEDERAL · 5 U.S.C. · Chapter 9

Effect on other laws, pending legal proceedings, and unexpended appropriations

5 U.S.C. § 907
Title5Government Organization and Employees
Chapter9 — EXECUTIVE REORGANIZATION

This text of 5 U.S.C. § 907 (Effect on other laws, pending legal proceedings, and unexpended appropriations) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
5 U.S.C. § 907.

Text

(a)A statute enacted, and a regulation or other action made, prescribed, issued, granted, or performed in respect of or by an agency or function affected by a reorganization under this chapter, before the effective date of the reorganization, has, except to the extent rescinded, modified, superseded, or made inapplicable by or under authority of law or by the abolition of a function, the same effect as if the reorganization had not been made. However, if the statute, regulation, or other action has vested the functions in the agency from which it is removed under the reorganization plan, the function, insofar as it is to be exercised after the plan becomes effective, shall be deemed as vested in the agency under which the function is placed by the plan.
(b)For the purpose of subsection (

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Ruckelshaus
439 F.2d 584 (D.C. Circuit, 1971)
166 case citations
United States v. Emmett Lovell Nabors
901 F.2d 1351 (Sixth Circuit, 1990)
144 case citations
United States v. Daniel Reid and Theodore E. Thomas, Jr.
517 F.2d 953 (Second Circuit, 1975)
100 case citations
United States v. James Hillsman and Clinton Bush
522 F.2d 454 (Seventh Circuit, 1975)
43 case citations
Harrison Wellford v. William D. Ruckelshaus
439 F.2d 598 (D.C. Circuit, 1971)
27 case citations
District of Columbia v. North Washington Neighbors, Inc.
367 A.2d 143 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1976)
23 case citations
United States v. Keith Stanford Irick
497 F.2d 1369 (Fifth Circuit, 1974)
13 case citations
Munnelly v. United States Postal Service
805 F.2d 295 (Eighth Circuit, 1986)
12 case citations
United States v. Jaime Lopez, Also Known as Salvidor Lopez-Aguilar
586 F.2d 978 (Second Circuit, 1978)
8 case citations
Quivira Mining Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
728 F.2d 477 (Tenth Circuit, 1984)
5 case citations
United States v. Harrington
524 F. Supp. 292 (E.D. California, 1981)
2 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 396; Pub. L. 95–17, §2, Apr. 6, 1977, 91 Stat. 32.)

Editorial Notes

In subsections (a) and (c), the words "the provisions of" in the phrase "under this chapter" are omitted as unnecessary.
In subsection (c), the words "the suit, action, or other proceeding" are substituted for "the same".
In subsection (d), the words "shall revert" are substituted for "shall be . . . returned", and the words "impounded and" are omitted as unnecessary.
Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1977—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 95–17 reenacted subsecs. (a) and (b) without change.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 95–17 substituted "twelve months" for "12 months".
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 95–17 reenacted subsec. (d) without change.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 U.S.C. § 907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/5/907.