FEDERAL · 5 U.S.C. · Chapter 9
Effect on other laws, pending legal proceedings, and unexpended appropriations
5 U.S.C. § 907
Title5 — Government Organization and Employees
Chapter9 — EXECUTIVE REORGANIZATION
This text of 5 U.S.C. § 907 (Effect on other laws, pending legal proceedings, and unexpended appropriations) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
5 U.S.C. § 907.
Text
(a)A statute enacted, and a regulation or other action made, prescribed, issued, granted, or performed in respect of or by an agency or function affected by a reorganization under this chapter, before the effective date of the reorganization, has, except to the extent rescinded, modified, superseded, or made inapplicable by or under authority of law or by the abolition of a function, the same effect as if the reorganization had not been made. However, if the statute, regulation, or other action has vested the functions in the agency from which it is removed under the reorganization plan, the function, insofar as it is to be exercised after the plan becomes effective, shall be deemed as vested in the agency under which the function is placed by the plan.
(b)For the purpose of subsection (
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Augustin Alvarez, Oscar Hernandez, Mario C. Simon, Rolando Rios, Ramon Raymond, Eduardo Portal, Victoriano Concepcion, A/K/A "Macho"
755 F.2d 830 (Eleventh Circuit, 1985)
Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Ruckelshaus
439 F.2d 584 (D.C. Circuit, 1971)
United States v. Emmett Lovell Nabors
901 F.2d 1351 (Sixth Circuit, 1990)
United States v. Daniel Reid and Theodore E. Thomas, Jr.
517 F.2d 953 (Second Circuit, 1975)
United States v. James Hillsman and Clinton Bush
522 F.2d 454 (Seventh Circuit, 1975)
Harrison Wellford v. William D. Ruckelshaus
439 F.2d 598 (D.C. Circuit, 1971)
District of Columbia v. North Washington Neighbors, Inc.
367 A.2d 143 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1976)
United States v. Keith Stanford Irick
497 F.2d 1369 (Fifth Circuit, 1974)
Munnelly v. United States Postal Service
805 F.2d 295 (Eighth Circuit, 1986)
United States v. Jaime Lopez, Also Known as Salvidor Lopez-Aguilar
586 F.2d 978 (Second Circuit, 1978)
Quivira Mining Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
728 F.2d 477 (Tenth Circuit, 1984)
United States v. Harrington
524 F. Supp. 292 (E.D. California, 1981)
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
677 F. Supp. 918 (N.D. Illinois, 1987)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 396; Pub. L. 95–17, §2, Apr. 6, 1977, 91 Stat. 32.)
Editorial Notes
In subsections (a) and (c), the words "the provisions of" in the phrase "under this chapter" are omitted as unnecessary.
In subsection (c), the words "the suit, action, or other proceeding" are substituted for "the same".
In subsection (d), the words "shall revert" are substituted for "shall be . . . returned", and the words "impounded and" are omitted as unnecessary.
Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1977—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 95–17 reenacted subsecs. (a) and (b) without change.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 95–17 substituted "twelve months" for "12 months".
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 95–17 reenacted subsec. (d) without change.
In subsection (c), the words "the suit, action, or other proceeding" are substituted for "the same".
In subsection (d), the words "shall revert" are substituted for "shall be . . . returned", and the words "impounded and" are omitted as unnecessary.
Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1977—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 95–17 reenacted subsecs. (a) and (b) without change.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 95–17 substituted "twelve months" for "12 months".
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 95–17 reenacted subsec. (d) without change.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 U.S.C. § 907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/5/907.