FEDERAL · 5 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER III—CIVIL SERVICE RETIREMENT
Deferred retirement
5 U.S.C. § 8338
Title5 — Government Organization and Employees
ChapterSUBCHAPTER III—CIVIL SERVICE RETIREMENT
This text of 5 U.S.C. § 8338 (Deferred retirement) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
5 U.S.C. § 8338.
Text
(a)An employee who is separated from the service or transferred to a position in which he does not continue subject to this subchapter after completing 5 years of civilian service is entitled to an annuity beginning at the age of 62 years.
(b)A Member who, after December 31, 1955, is separated from the service as a Member after completing 5 years of civilian service is entitled to an annuity beginning at the age of 62 years. A Member who is separated from the service after completing 10 or more years of Member service is entitled to an annuity beginning at the age of 60 years. A Member who is separated from the service after completing 20 or more years of service, including 10 or more years of Member service, is entitled to a reduced annuity beginning at the age of 50 years.
(c)A judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Desfosses v. Desfosses
815 P.2d 1094 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1991)
Tirso S. Herrera v. The United States
849 F.2d 1416 (Federal Circuit, 1988)
In Re the Marriage of Castor
817 P.2d 665 (Montana Supreme Court, 1991)
Hector M. Tirado v. Department of the Treasury
757 F.2d 263 (Federal Circuit, 1985)
Severino A. Dupo v. Office of Personnel Management
69 F.3d 1125 (Federal Circuit, 1995)
Wylene J. Nebblett,petitioner v. Office of Personnel Management,respondent
237 F.3d 1353 (Federal Circuit, 2001)
In Re Marriage of Cranor
78 S.W.3d 150 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2002)
Olds v. Olds
531 N.E.2d 1219 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1988)
Kadlecek v. Kadlecek
93 S.W.3d 903 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002)
Landen S. Levy v. Office of Personnel Management
902 F.2d 1550 (Federal Circuit, 1990)
Heisterberg v. Standridge
656 S.W.2d 138 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1983)
Oreman v. Oreman
971 So. 2d 1149 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2007)
William R. Vagg v. Office of Personnel Management
1 F.3d 1208 (Federal Circuit, 1993)
In Re Bizon
28 B.R. 886 (D. Maryland, 1983)
Vidal v. Office of Personnel Management
267 F. App'x 946 (Federal Circuit, 2008)
Betty L. Hubbard v. Office of Personnel Management
247 F.3d 1236 (Federal Circuit, 2001)
Hunt v. Merit Systems Protection Board
476 F. App'x 739 (Federal Circuit, 2012)
Reynaldo Arbizo v. Office of Personnel Management
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2016)
Ronald Watkins v. Office of Personnel Management
(Merit Systems Protection Board, 2022)
Corkery v. Office of Personnel Management
151 F. App'x 966 (Federal Circuit, 2005)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 574; Pub. L. 90–83, §1(77), Sept. 11, 1967, 81 Stat. 214; Pub. L. 98–94, title XII, §1256(d), Sept. 24, 1983, 97 Stat. 702; Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title IX, §924(d)(1)(A), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2832.)
Editorial Notes
In subsection (b), the words "after December 31, 1955" are substituted for "on or after January 1, 1956". The word "hereafter" is omitted as unnecessary.
Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.
1967 Act
This section amends 5 U.S.C. 8338(a) for consistency within the subchapter and to reflect that it is the individual, rather than the position, that is subject to the subchapter.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1994—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 103–337 substituted "Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces" for "Court of Military Appeals".
1983—Subsecs. (c), (d). Pub. L. 98–94 added subsec. (c), and redesignated former subsec. (c) as (d).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Savings Provisions Deferred Annuities Under Laws Repealed by Pub. L. 90–83
Pub. L. 90–83, §10(a), Sept. 11, 1967, 81 Stat. 222, provided that: "The right to a deferred annuity on satisfaction of the conditions attached thereto is continued notwithstanding the repeal by this Act of the law conferring the right."
Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.
1967 Act
This section amends 5 U.S.C. 8338(a) for consistency within the subchapter and to reflect that it is the individual, rather than the position, that is subject to the subchapter.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1994—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 103–337 substituted "Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces" for "Court of Military Appeals".
1983—Subsecs. (c), (d). Pub. L. 98–94 added subsec. (c), and redesignated former subsec. (c) as (d).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Savings Provisions Deferred Annuities Under Laws Repealed by Pub. L. 90–83
Pub. L. 90–83, §10(a), Sept. 11, 1967, 81 Stat. 222, provided that: "The right to a deferred annuity on satisfaction of the conditions attached thereto is continued notwithstanding the repeal by this Act of the law conferring the right."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 U.S.C. § 8338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/5/8338.