FEDERAL · 5 U.S.C. · Chapter 81
Physical examinations
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
(a)An employee shall submit to examination by a medical officer of the United States, or by a physician designated or approved by the Secretary of Labor, after the injury and as frequently and at the times and places as may be reasonably required. The employee may have a physician designated and paid by him present to participate in the examination. If there is disagreement between the physician making the examination for the United States and the physician of the employee, the Secretary shall appoint a third physician who shall make an examination.
(b)An employee is entitled to be paid expenses incident to an examination required by the Secretary which in the opinion of the Secretary are necessary and reasonable, including transportation and loss of wages incurred in order to be examine
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
5 U.S.C. § 8123 (Physical examinations) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brown v. Perez
835 F.3d 1223 (Tenth Circuit, 2016)
Patricio Hernandez-Cordero and Maria Guadalupe Ortega De Hernandez v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service
819 F.2d 558 (Fifth Circuit, 1987)
Lepre v. Department of Labor
275 F.3d 59 (D.C. Circuit, 2001)
Gibbs v. United States
865 F. Supp. 2d 1127 (M.D. Florida, 2012)
United States v. Vazquez-Soto
939 F.3d 365 (First Circuit, 2019)
In Re the Marriage of Geigle
920 P.2d 251 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1996)
Burnice Stackhouse v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
111 A.3d 636 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2015)
Nurriddin v. Acosta
327 F. Supp. 3d 147 (D.C. Circuit, 2018)
Ramirez v. Koromilas
199 F. App'x 302 (Fifth Circuit, 2006)
Cleopatra McDougal v. Alexis M. Herman, Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor
161 F.3d 198 (Third Circuit, 1998)
Avedis v. Herman
192 F.R.D. 477 (S.D. New York, 2000)
JM Banks v. United States
190 F. Supp. 3d 618 (E.D. Texas, 2016)
Wexler v. United States
(D. Colorado, 2019)
Avedis v. Herman
8 F. App'x 69 (Second Circuit, 2001)
Kendall v. Brock
689 F. Supp. 354 (D. Vermont, 1987)
Agustin v. Su
(N.D. California, 2024)
Nurriddin v. Perez
(District of Columbia, 2018)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 544.)
Editorial Notes
In subsections (a) and (c), the words "duly qualified" in former sections 771 and 772 are omitted as unnecessary in view of the definition of "physician" in section 8101.
In subsection (c) the words "fees for examinations" in former section 773(a) are substituted for "fees or examinations" since the word "or" was erroneously in the 1949 amendment. The words "any sum payable to the employee under section 771 of this title" in former section 773(a) are omitted as unnecessary because the same provision appeared in former section 771, which is carried into subsection (b).
Administration of this subchapter was transferred to the Secretary of Labor by section 1 of 1950 Reorg. Plan No. 19, 64 Stat. 1271 (see section 8145).
Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.
In subsection (c) the words "fees for examinations" in former section 773(a) are substituted for "fees or examinations" since the word "or" was erroneously in the 1949 amendment. The words "any sum payable to the employee under section 771 of this title" in former section 773(a) are omitted as unnecessary because the same provision appeared in former section 771, which is carried into subsection (b).
Administration of this subchapter was transferred to the Secretary of Labor by section 1 of 1950 Reorg. Plan No. 19, 64 Stat. 1271 (see section 8145).
Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.