FEDERAL · 5 U.S.C. · Chapter 6

Judicial review

5 U.S.C. § 611
Title5Government Organization and Employees
Chapter6 — THE ANALYSIS OF REGULATORY FUNCTIONS

This text of 5 U.S.C. § 611 (Judicial review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
5 U.S.C. § 611.

Text

(a)(1) For any rule subject to this chapter, a small entity that is adversely affected or aggrieved by final agency action is entitled to judicial review of agency compliance with the requirements of sections 601, 604, 605(b), 608(b), and 610 in accordance with chapter 7. Agency compliance with sections 607 and 609(a) shall be judicially reviewable in connection with judicial review of section 604.
(2)Each court having jurisdiction to review such rule for compliance with section 553, or under any other provision of law, shall have jurisdiction to review any claims of noncompliance with sections 601, 604, 605(b), 608(b), and 610 in accordance with chapter 7. Agency compliance with sections 607 and 609(a) shall be judicially reviewable in connection with judicial review of section 604.
(3)(

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

National Ass'n of Home Builders v. Environmental Protection Agency
682 F.3d 1032 (D.C. Circuit, 2012)
69 case citations
Michigan v. Thomas
805 F.2d 176 (Sixth Circuit, 1986)
52 case citations
Nat'l Ass'n v. Trump
298 F. Supp. 3d 209 (D.C. Circuit, 2018)
42 case citations
Louisiana Forestry Ass'n Inc. v. Secretary United States Department of Labor
745 F.3d 653 (Third Circuit, 2014)
32 case citations
Mast Industries, Inc. v. Regan
596 F. Supp. 1567 (Court of International Trade, 1984)
29 case citations
Teledyne, Inc. v. United States
50 Fed. Cl. 155 (Federal Claims, 2001)
27 case citations
Alenco Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
201 F.3d 608 (Fifth Circuit, 2000)
17 case citations
Aeronautical Repair Station Ass'n v. Federal Aviation Administration
494 F.3d 161 (D.C. Circuit, 2007)
16 case citations
Northport Health Svcs. of Ark. v. USDHHS
14 F.4th 856 (Eighth Circuit, 2021)
16 case citations
Hemp Industries Ass'n v. Drug Enforcement Administration
357 F.3d 1012 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
12 case citations
Northwest Mining Ass'n v. Babbitt
5 F. Supp. 2d 9 (District of Columbia, 1998)
11 case citations
La Gloria Oil & Gas Co. v. United States
56 Fed. Cl. 211 (Federal Claims, 2003)
10 case citations
Louisiana Forestry Ass'n v. Solis
889 F. Supp. 2d 711 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2012)
10 case citations
North Carolina Fisheries Ass'n, Inc. v. Daley
16 F. Supp. 2d 647 (E.D. Virginia, 1997)
9 case citations
Wirtz v. CASCADE EMPLOYER'S ASS'N, INC., OF PACIFIC NW
219 F. Supp. 84 (District of Columbia, 1963)
8 case citations
Florida Bankers Association v. United States Department of Treasury
19 F. Supp. 3d 111 (District of Columbia, 2014)
8 case citations
Lehigh Valley Farmers v. Block
640 F. Supp. 1497 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1986)
7 case citations
Associated Fisheries of Maine, Inc. v. Daley
954 F. Supp. 383 (D. Maine, 1997)
7 case citations
Stinson Canning Co., Inc. v. Mosbacher
731 F. Supp. 32 (D. Maine, 1990)
7 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 96–354, §3(a), Sept. 19, 1980, 94 Stat. 1169; amended Pub. L. 104–121, title II, §242, Mar. 29, 1996, 110 Stat. 865.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1996—Pub. L. 104–121 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows:
"(a) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (b), any determination by an agency concerning the applicability of any of the provisions of this chapter to any action of the agency shall not be subject to judicial review.
"(b) Any regulatory flexibility analysis prepared under sections 603 and 604 of this title and the compliance or noncompliance of the agency with the provisions of this chapter shall not be subject to judicial review. When an action for judicial review of a rule is instituted, any regulatory flexibility analysis for such rule shall constitute part of the whole record of agency action in connection with the review.
"(c) Nothing in this section bars judicial review of any other impact statement or similar analysis required by any other law if judicial review of such statement or analysis is otherwise provided by law."

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1996 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 104–121 effective on expiration of 90 days after Mar. 29, 1996, but inapplicable to interpretative rules for which a notice of proposed rulemaking was published prior to Mar. 29, 1996, see section 245 of Pub. L. 104–121, set out as a note under section 601 of this title.

Effective Date
Section effective Jan. 1, 1981, see section 4 of Pub. L. 96–354, set out as a note under section 601 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 U.S.C. § 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/5/611.