FEDERAL · 49 U.S.C. · Chapter 801
Liability for delivery of goods
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
(a)General Rules.—A common carrier is liable for damages to a person having title to, or right to possession of, goods when—
(1)the carrier delivers the goods to a person not entitled to their possession unless the delivery is authorized under section 80110(b)(2) or (3) of this title;
(2)the carrier makes a delivery under section 80110(b)(2) or (3) of this title after being requested by or for a person having title to, or right to possession of, the goods not to make the delivery; or
(3)at the time of delivery under section 80110(b)(2) or (3) of this title, the carrier has information it is delivering the goods to a person not entitled to their possession.
(b)Effectiveness of Request or Information.—A request or information is effective under subsection (a)(2) or (3) of this section o
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
49 U.S.C. § 80111 (Liability for delivery of goods) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. v. Crowley American Transport, Inc.
117 F. Supp. 2d 663 (S.D. Ohio, 2000)
PolyGram Group Distribution, Inc. v. Transus, Inc.
990 F. Supp. 1454 (N.D. Georgia, 1997)
Union Pacific Railroad v. Beemac Trucking, LLC
929 F. Supp. 2d 904 (D. Nebraska, 2013)
Ace Bag & Burlap Co. v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.
40 F. Supp. 2d 233 (D. New Jersey, 1999)
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS Subscribing To A Policy Of Insurance v. GUYANA NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL COMPANY INC.
(S.D. Florida, 2024)
Hotung v. Cargo of a Crate Containing Nine Boxes of Documents Shipped Aboard the M/V Hanjin Nagoya
452 F. Supp. 2d 564 (D. New Jersey, 2006)
Sekata v. Federal Express Corporation
(N.D. Ohio, 2020)
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
(S.D. Illinois, 2021)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1350.)
Editorial Notes
In subsection (a), before clause (1), the word "title" is substituted for "right of property" for consistency in this chapter.
In subsection (c), the words "negotiable bill of lading" are substituted for "order bill . . . the negotiation of which would transfer the right to the possession of the goods" in 49 App.:91 for consistency in this chapter.
In subsection (c), the words "negotiable bill of lading" are substituted for "order bill . . . the negotiation of which would transfer the right to the possession of the goods" in 49 App.:91 for consistency in this chapter.