FEDERAL · 49 U.S.C. · Chapter 465
Application of certain criminal laws to acts on aircraft
49 U.S.C. § 46506
Title49 — Transportation
Chapter465 — SPECIAL AIRCRAFT JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED STATES
This text of 49 U.S.C. § 46506 (Application of certain criminal laws to acts on aircraft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
49 U.S.C. § 46506.
Text
An individual on an aircraft in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States who commits an act that—
(1)if committed in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States (as defined in section 7 of title 18) would violate section 113, 114, 661, 662, 1111, 1112, 1113, or 2111 or chapter 109A of title 18, shall be fined under title 18, imprisoned under that section or chapter, or both; or
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Umar Abdulmutallab
739 F.3d 891 (Sixth Circuit, 2014)
United States v. Reid
369 F.3d 619 (First Circuit, 2004)
United States v. Delis
558 F.3d 177 (Second Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Polizzi
549 F. Supp. 2d 308 (E.D. New York, 2008)
United States v. Jennings
496 F.3d 344 (Fourth Circuit, 2007)
United States v. Bayes
210 F.3d 64 (First Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Jahagirdar
466 F.3d 149 (First Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Srinivasa Erramilli
788 F.3d 723 (Seventh Circuit, 2015)
United States v. Rick Joe Baer, United States of America v. William F. Chan
324 F.3d 282 (Fourth Circuit, 2003)
United States v. Spellman
243 F. Supp. 2d 285 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2003)
United States v. Monique Lozoya
982 F.3d 648 (Ninth Circuit, 2020)
United States v. Johnson
458 F. App'x 727 (Tenth Circuit, 2012)
United States v. Bawer Aksal
638 F. App'x 136 (Third Circuit, 2015)
Carroll v. Trump
141 F.4th 366 (Second Circuit, 2025)
United States v. Mays
514 F. Supp. 2d 1298 (M.D. Florida, 2007)
United States v. Debrom Kokobu
(Eighth Circuit, 2018)
United States v. Jurkovic
(Ninth Circuit, 2025)
United States v. Nadeem Mehmood Quraishi
(Second Circuit, 2018)
United States v. Juan Price
(Ninth Circuit, 2020)
United States v. David Henry Wysocki, II
463 F. App'x 814 (Eleventh Circuit, 2012)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1245.)
Editorial Notes
In clause (1), the words "fined under title 18, imprisoned under that section or chapter, or both" are substituted for "punished as provided therein" for consistency with title 18.
In clause (2), the words "fined under title 18, imprisoned under section 9 of the Act, or both" are substituted for "punished as provided therein" for consistency with title 18.
Editorial Notes
References in Text
Section 9 of the Act of July 29, 1892, referred to in par. (2), is section 9 of act July 29, 1892, ch. 320, 27 Stat. 324, which is not classified to the Code. Section 9 of the Act was reclassified to section 22–1312 of the D.C. Code (2014).
In clause (2), the words "fined under title 18, imprisoned under section 9 of the Act, or both" are substituted for "punished as provided therein" for consistency with title 18.
Editorial Notes
References in Text
Section 9 of the Act of July 29, 1892, referred to in par. (2), is section 9 of act July 29, 1892, ch. 320, 27 Stat. 324, which is not classified to the Code. Section 9 of the Act was reclassified to section 22–1312 of the D.C. Code (2014).
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
49 U.S.C. § 46506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/49/46506.