FEDERAL · 49 U.S.C. · Chapter 451
Relationship to other laws, regulations, standards, and orders
49 U.S.C. § 45106
Title49 — Transportation
Chapter451 — ALCOHOL AND CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES TESTING
This text of 49 U.S.C. § 45106 (Relationship to other laws, regulations, standards, and orders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
49 U.S.C. § 45106.
Text
(a)Effect on State and Local Government Laws, Regulations, Standards, or Orders.—A State or local government may not prescribe, issue, or continue in effect a law, regulation, standard, or order that is inconsistent with regulations prescribed under this chapter. However, a regulation prescribed under this chapter does not preempt a State criminal law that imposes sanctions for reckless conduct leading to loss of life, injury, or damage to property.
(b)International Obligations and Foreign Laws.—
(1)In prescribing regulations under this chapter, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration—
(A)shall establish only requirements applicable to foreign air carriers that are consistent with international obligations of the United States; and
(B)shall consider applicable laws and
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Christopher Scott Hughes v. Eleventh Judicial
377 F.3d 1258 (Eleventh Circuit, 2004)
Schmeling v. Nordam
97 F.3d 1336 (Tenth Circuit, 1996)
Philip J. Frank v. Delta Airlines Inc., Delta Airlines Inc.
314 F.3d 195 (Fifth Circuit, 2002)
Yasuko Ishikawa v. Delta Airlines, Inc., a Georgia Corporation, and Labone, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
343 F.3d 1129 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
Drake v. Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings
290 F. Supp. 2d 352 (E.D. New York, 2003)
Aeronautical Repair Station Ass'n v. Federal Aviation Administration
494 F.3d 161 (D.C. Circuit, 2007)
Drake v. Delta Airlines, Inc.
923 F. Supp. 387 (E.D. New York, 1996)
Drake v. Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings
458 F.3d 48 (Second Circuit, 2006)
Fifie v. Cooksey
403 F. Supp. 2d 1131 (M.D. Florida, 2005)
CARA JONES V. GOOGLE LLC
(Ninth Circuit, 2022)
Frank v. Delta Airlines Inc
(Fifth Circuit, 2002)
Richard W. Drake v. Laboratory Corporation Of America Holdings
458 F.3d 48 (Second Circuit, 2006)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1224; Pub. L. 107–71, title I, §139(3), Nov. 19, 2001, 115 Stat. 640.)
Editorial Notes
In subsection (a), the word "prescribe" is substituted for "adopt" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code. The word "rule" is omitted as being synonymous with "regulation". The word "ordinance" is omitted as being included in "law" and "regulation". The words "actual" and "whether the provisions apply specifically to employees of an air carrier or foreign air carrier, or to the general public" are omitted as surplus.
In subsection (c) the word "prevent" is substituted for "restrict the discretion of" to eliminate unnecessary words.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2001—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 107–71 substituted "screening employees" for "screening contract employees".
In subsection (c) the word "prevent" is substituted for "restrict the discretion of" to eliminate unnecessary words.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2001—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 107–71 substituted "screening employees" for "screening contract employees".
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
49 U.S.C. § 45106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/49/45106.