FEDERAL · 49 U.S.C. · Chapter 327
Relationship to State law
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
Except to the extent that State law is inconsistent with this chapter, this chapter does not—
(1)affect a State law on disconnecting, altering, or tampering with an odometer with intent to defraud; or
(2)exempt a person from complying with that law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
49 U.S.C. § 32711 (Relationship to State law) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Austin v. Stokes-Craven Holding Corp.
691 S.E.2d 135 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2010)
Miguel Perez v. Z Frank Oldsmobile, Inc., Cross-Appellee
223 F.3d 617 (Seventh Circuit, 2000)
Simpson v. Anthony Auto Sales, Inc.
32 F. Supp. 2d 405 (W.D. Louisiana, 1998)
Riggs v. Anthony Auto Sales, Inc.
32 F. Supp. 2d 411 (W.D. Louisiana, 1998)
Glover v. General Motors Corp.
959 F. Supp. 332 (W.D. Virginia, 1997)
Bodine v. Graco Inc.
(Ninth Circuit, 2008)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1056.)
Editorial Notes
In this section, before clause (1), the words "and then only to the extent of the inconsistency" are omitted as surplus. In clause (1), the word "affect" is substituted for "annul, alter, or affect" to eliminate unnecessary words. In clause (2), the words "subject to the provisions of this subchapter" are omitted as surplus.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1994—Pub. L. 103–429, §6(43)(C), Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4383, added items 32918 and 32919 and struck out former item 32918 "Preemption".
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1994—Pub. L. 103–429, §6(43)(C), Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4383, added items 32918 and 32919 and struck out former item 32918 "Preemption".