FEDERAL · 49 U.S.C. · Chapter 327
Findings and purposes
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
(a)Findings.—Congress finds that—
(1)buyers of motor vehicles rely heavily on the odometer reading as an index of the condition and value of a vehicle;
(2)buyers are entitled to rely on the odometer reading as an accurate indication of the mileage of the vehicle;
(3)an accurate indication of the mileage assists a buyer in deciding on the safety and reliability of the vehicle; and
(4)motor vehicles move in, or affect, interstate and foreign commerce.
(b)Purposes.—The purposes of this chapter are—
(1)to prohibit tampering with motor vehicle odometers; and
(2)to provide safeguards to protect purchasers in the sale of motor vehicles with altered or reset odometers.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
49 U.S.C. § 32701 (Findings and purposes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Quinn v. Cherry Lane Auto Plaza, Inc.
225 P.3d 266 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2009)
David J. Diersen v. Chicago Car Exchange
110 F.3d 481 (Seventh Circuit, 1997)
Glendale Owens v. Samkle Automotive Inc.
425 F.3d 1318 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
Garry Ioffe v. Skokie Motor Sales, Inc., Doing Business as Sherman Dodge
414 F.3d 708 (Seventh Circuit, 2005)
A.J.'s Automotive Sales, Inc. v. Freet
725 N.E.2d 955 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2000)
Winkler v. DTE, Inc.
205 F.R.D. 235 (D. Arizona, 2001)
Duchscherer v. W.W. Wallwork, Inc.
534 N.W.2d 13 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1995)
Small v. Savannah International Motors, Inc.
619 S.E.2d 738 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2005)
Mayline Enterprises, Inc. v. Milea Truck Sales Corp.
641 F. Supp. 2d 304 (S.D. New York, 2009)
Locascio v. Imports Unlimited, Inc.
309 F. Supp. 2d 267 (D. Connecticut, 2004)
Shaghoian v. Aghajani
228 F. Supp. 2d 1107 (C.D. California, 2002)
Gourrier v. Joe Myers Motors, Inc.
115 S.W.3d 570 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002)
Truck Trailer Manufacturers Association v. EPA
17 F.4th 1198 (D.C. Circuit, 2021)
In Re Nissan North America, Inc. Odometer Lit.
664 F. Supp. 2d 873 (M.D. Tennessee, 2009)
Eromon v. Grand Auto Sales, Inc.
351 F. Supp. 2d 825 (N.D. Illinois, 2004)
Tuckish v. Pompano Motor Co.
337 F. Supp. 2d 1313 (S.D. Florida, 2004)
Edlund v. Montgomery
355 F. Supp. 2d 987 (D. Minnesota, 2005)
Rodriguez v. AUTO SALES, INC.
477 F. Supp. 2d 477 (D. Connecticut, 2007)
Nabors v. Auto Sports Unlimited, Inc.
475 F. Supp. 2d 646 (E.D. Michigan, 2007)
Kennedy v. BMW Financial Services, N.A.
363 F. Supp. 2d 110 (D. Connecticut, 2005)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1048.)