FEDERAL · 49 U.S.C. · Chapter 203
Exemption for technological improvements
49 U.S.C. § 20306
Title49 — Transportation
Chapter203 — SAFETY APPLIANCES
This text of 49 U.S.C. § 20306 (Exemption for technological improvements) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
49 U.S.C. § 20306.
Text
(a)General.—Subject to subsection (b) of this section, the Secretary of Transportation may exempt from the requirements of this chapter railroad equipment or equipment that will be operated on rails, when those requirements preclude the development or implementation of more efficient railroad transportation equipment or other transportation innovations under existing law.
(b)Conditions for Exemption.—The Secretary may grant an exemption under subsection (a) of this section only on the basis of—
(1)findings based on evidence developed at a hearing; or
(2)an agreement between national railroad labor representatives and the developer of the new equipment or technology.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lorincie v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
34 F. Supp. 2d 929 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1998)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 103–272, §1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 883.)
Editorial Notes
In subsection (a), the words "Notwithstanding any other provision of law" and "the mandatory requirements of" are omitted as surplus. The words "existing law" are substituted for "the existing statutes" for consistency in the revised title.
In subsection (b), the words before clause (1) are added because of the restatement. Clause (1) is substituted for "after a hearing and consistent with findings based upon evidence developed therein" to eliminate unnecessary words. In clause (2), the words "an agreement" are substituted for "expressions of agreement" to eliminate unnecessary words.
In subsection (b), the words before clause (1) are added because of the restatement. Clause (1) is substituted for "after a hearing and consistent with findings based upon evidence developed therein" to eliminate unnecessary words. In clause (2), the words "an agreement" are substituted for "expressions of agreement" to eliminate unnecessary words.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
49 U.S.C. § 20306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/49/20306.