FEDERAL · 49 U.S.C. · Chapter 145
Tax discrimination against motor carrier transportation property
49 U.S.C. § 14502
Title49 — Transportation
Chapter145 — FEDERAL-STATE RELATIONS
This text of 49 U.S.C. § 14502 (Tax discrimination against motor carrier transportation property) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
49 U.S.C. § 14502.
Text
(a)Definitions.—In this section, the following definitions apply:
(1)Assessment.—The term "assessment" means valuation for a property tax levied by a taxing district.
(2)Assessment jurisdiction.—The term "assessment jurisdiction" means a geographical area in a State used in determining the assessed value of property for ad valorem taxation.
(3)Motor carrier transportation property.—The term "motor carrier transportation property" means property, as defined by the Secretary, owned or used by a motor carrier providing transportation in interstate commerce whether or not such transportation is subject to jurisdiction under subchapter I of chapter 135.
(4)Commercial and industrial property.—The term "commercial and industrial property" means property, other than transportation property an
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Western Ports v. Employment SEC. Dept.
41 P.3d 510 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2002)
Western Ports Transportation, Inc. v. Employment Security Department
110 Wash. App. 440 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2002)
Tri-State Coach Lines, Inc. v. Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority
732 N.E.2d 1137 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 2000)
Franks & Son, Inc. v. State
966 P.2d 1232 (Washington Supreme Court, 1998)
Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
2006 WI 88 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2006)
Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Morgan
231 F.R.D. 518 (M.D. Tennessee, 2005)
J. R. Tharpe Trucking Company, Inc. v. Prince Edward County, Virginia
(E.D. Virginia, 2025)
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Feek
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
Tri-State Coach Lines, Inc. v. Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority
(Appellate Court of Illinois, 2000)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §103, Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 900.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Prior Provisions
Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 11503a of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
Prior Provisions
Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 11503a of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
49 U.S.C. § 14502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/49/14502.