FEDERAL · 49 U.S.C. · Chapter 109

Exception

49 U.S.C. § 10906
Title49Transportation
Chapter109 — LICENSING

This text of 49 U.S.C. § 10906 (Exception) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
49 U.S.C. § 10906.

Text

Notwithstanding section 10901 and subchapter II of chapter 113 of this title, and without the approval of the Board, a rail carrier providing transportation subject to the jurisdiction of the Board under this part may enter into arrangements for the joint ownership or joint use of spur, industrial, team, switching, or side tracks. The Board does not have authority under this chapter over construction, acquisition, operation, abandonment, or discontinuance of spur, industrial, team, switching, or side tracks.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Preseault v. Interstate Commerce Commission
494 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1990)
670 case citations
Preseault v. United States
100 F.3d 1525 (Federal Circuit, 1996)
251 case citations
Port City Properties v. Union Pacific Railroad
518 F.3d 1186 (Tenth Circuit, 2008)
147 case citations
Hayfield Northern Railroad v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.
467 U.S. 622 (Supreme Court, 1984)
133 case citations
Lawson v. State
730 P.2d 1308 (Washington Supreme Court, 1986)
100 case citations
Chevy Chase Land Co. v. United States
733 A.2d 1055 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1999)
60 case citations
Baros v. Texas Mexican Railway Co.
400 F.3d 228 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)
27 case citations
Chevy Chase Land Co. of Montgomery County v. United States
37 Fed. Cl. 545 (Federal Claims, 1997)
27 case citations
Washington State Department of Game v. Interstate Commerce Commission
829 F.2d 877 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)
23 case citations
Preseault v. United States
27 Fed. Cl. 69 (Federal Claims, 1992)
20 case citations
Grantwood Village v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company
95 F.3d 654 (Eighth Circuit, 1996)
19 case citations
New York & Atlantic Railway v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority
32 A.D.3d 943 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
11 case citations
Chatham v. Blount County
789 So. 2d 235 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2001)
9 case citations
Flynn v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp.(BNSF)
98 F. Supp. 2d 1186 (E.D. Washington, 2000)
7 case citations
Wichita Terminal Ass'n v. F.Y.G. Investments, Inc.
305 P.3d 13 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2013)
7 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §102(a), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 827.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Prior Provisions
Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 10907 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a).
A prior section 10906, Pub. L. 95–473, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1406, related to offering abandoned rail properties for sale for public purposes, prior to the general amendment of this subtitle by Pub. L. 104–88, §102(a). See section 10905 of this title.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date
Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 U.S.C. § 10906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/49/10906.