FEDERAL · 47 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER V–A—CABLE COMMUNICATIONS

Renewal

47 U.S.C. § 546
Title47Telecommunications
ChapterSUBCHAPTER V–A—CABLE COMMUNICATIONS
PartIII

This text of 47 U.S.C. § 546 (Renewal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
47 U.S.C. § 546.

Text

(a)Commencement of proceedings; public notice and participation
(1)A franchising authority may, on its own initiative during the 6-month period which begins with the 36th month before the franchise expiration, commence a proceeding which affords the public in the franchise area appropriate notice and participation for the purpose of (A) identifying the future cable-related community needs and interests, and (B) reviewing the performance of the cable operator under the franchise during the then current franchise term. If the cable operator submits, during such 6-month period, a written renewal notice requesting the commencement of such a proceeding, the franchising authority shall commence such a proceeding not later than 6 months after the date such notice is submitted.
(2)The cable ope

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

NEPSK, Inc. v. Town of Houlton
283 F.3d 1 (First Circuit, 2002)
129 case citations
Rollins Cablevue, Inc. v. Saienni Enterprises
633 F. Supp. 1315 (D. Delaware, 1986)
20 case citations
Council of New York v. Public Service Commission
781 N.E.2d 886 (New York Court of Appeals, 2002)
12 case citations
Council v. Department of Public Utility Control
788 A.2d 29 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2002)
12 case citations
Southeast Florida Cable, Inc. v. Martin County
173 F.3d 1332 (Eleventh Circuit, 1999)
11 case citations
Union Catv, Inc. v. City of Sturgis, Kentucky
107 F.3d 434 (Sixth Circuit, 1997)
8 case citations
I-Star Communications Corp. v. City of East Cleveland
885 F. Supp. 1035 (N.D. Ohio, 1995)
7 case citations
City of New York v. Federal Communications Commission
814 F.2d 720 (D.C. Circuit, 1987)
2 case citations
Rolla Cable Systems, Inc. v. City of Rolla
745 F. Supp. 574 (E.D. Missouri, 1990)
2 case citations
Beach Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
959 F.2d 975 (D.C. Circuit, 1992)
1 case citations
Community TV Corp. v. Town of Belmont
674 A.2d 983 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1996)

Source Credit

History

(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title VI, §626, as added Pub. L. 98–549, §2, Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2791; amended Pub. L. 102–385, §18, Oct. 5, 1992, 106 Stat. 1493.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

References in Text
For "the effective date of this subchapter", referred to in subsec. (d), as 60 days after Oct. 30, 1984, except where otherwise expressly provided, see section 9(a) of Pub. L. 98–549, set out as an Effective Date note under section 521 of this title.

Amendments
1992—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–385, §18(a), amended subsec. (a) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (a) read as follows: "During the 6-month period which begins with the 36th month before the franchise expiration, the franchising authority may on its own initiative, and shall at the request of the cable operator, commence proceedings which afford the public in the franchise area appropriate notice and participation for the purpose of—
"(1) identifying the future cable-related community needs and interests; and
"(2) reviewing the performance of the cable operator under the franchise during the then current franchise term."
Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 102–385, §18(b), inserted "pursuant to subsection (b)" after "renewal of a franchise" and substituted "date of the submission of the cable operator's proposal pursuant to subsection (b)" for "completion of any proceedings under subsection (a)".
Subsec. (c)(1)(B). Pub. L. 102–385, §18(c), substituted "mix or quality" for "mix, quality, or level".
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 102–385, §18(d), inserted "that has been submitted in compliance with subsection (b)" after "Any denial of a proposal for renewal" and substituted "or the cable operator gives written notice of a failure or inability to cure and the franchising authority fails to object within a reasonable time after receipt of such notice" for "or has effectively acquiesced".
Subsec. (e)(2)(A). Pub. L. 102–385, §18(e), inserted ", other than harmless error," after "franchising authority".
Subsec. (i). Pub. L. 102–385, §18(f), added subsec. (i).

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1992 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 102–385 effective 60 days after Oct. 5, 1992, see section 28 of Pub. L. 102–385, set out as a note under section 325 of this title.

Effective Date
Section effective 60 days after Oct. 30, 1984, except where otherwise expressly provided, see section 9(a) of Pub. L. 98–549, set out as a note under section 521 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 U.S.C. § 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/47/546.