FEDERAL · 47 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER V–A—CABLE COMMUNICATIONS

Franchise fees

47 U.S.C. § 542
Title47Telecommunications
ChapterSUBCHAPTER V–A—CABLE COMMUNICATIONS
PartIII

This text of 47 U.S.C. § 542 (Franchise fees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
47 U.S.C. § 542.

Text

(a)Payment under terms of franchise Subject to the limitation of subsection (b), any cable operator may be required under the terms of any franchise to pay a franchise fee.
(b)Amount of fees per annum For any twelve-month period, the franchise fees paid by a cable operator with respect to any cable system shall not exceed 5 percent of such cable operator's gross revenues derived in such period from the operation of the cable system to provide cable services. For purposes of this section, the 12-month period shall be the 12-month period applicable under the franchise for accounting purposes. Nothing in this subsection shall prohibit a franchising authority and a cable operator from agreeing that franchise fees which lawfully could be collected for any such 12-month period shall be paid on

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dale v. Comcast Corp.
498 F.3d 1216 (Eleventh Circuit, 2007)
87 case citations
Warner Cable Communications, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. City of Niceville
911 F.2d 634 (Eleventh Circuit, 1990)
42 case citations
BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. Farris
542 F.3d 499 (Sixth Circuit, 2008)
40 case citations
City of Chicago v. Comcast Cable Holdings, L.L.C.
384 F.3d 901 (Seventh Circuit, 2004)
35 case citations
Dreamscape Design, Inc. v. Affinity Network, Inc.
414 F.3d 665 (Seventh Circuit, 2005)
18 case citations
Bass v. Prime Cable of Chicago, Inc.
674 N.E.2d 43 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1996)
17 case citations
Liberty Cablevision of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Municipality of Caguas
417 F.3d 216 (First Circuit, 2005)
12 case citations
Bruce v. City of Colorado Springs
131 P.3d 1187 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2005)
12 case citations
Cox Cable Hampton Roads, Inc. v. City of Norfolk
739 F. Supp. 1074 (E.D. Virginia, 1990)
6 case citations
Manibog v. Mediaone of Los Angeles, Inc.
81 Cal. App. 4th 1366 (California Court of Appeal, 2000)
5 case citations
Montgomery County v. Federal Communications Commission
863 F.3d 485 (Sixth Circuit, 2017)
4 case citations
Yakima Valley Cablevision, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
794 F.2d 737 (D.C. Circuit, 1986)
4 case citations
Time Warner Cable Inc. v. Cnty. of L. A.
235 Cal. Rptr. 3d 867 (California Court of Appeals, 5th District, 2018)
3 case citations
City of Eugene v. Comcast of Oregon II, Inc.
333 P.3d 1051 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2014)
3 case citations
City of Chicago v. Comcast Cable Holdings
872 N.E.2d 368 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 2007)
3 case citations
Parsons v. Comcast of California/Colorado/Washington I, Inc.
150 Wash. App. 721 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2009)
2 case citations
American Civil Liberties Union v. Federal Communications Commission
823 F.2d 1554 (D.C. Circuit, 1987)
1 case citations
Group W Cable, Inc. v. City of Santa Cruz
679 F. Supp. 977 (N.D. California, 1988)
1 case citations
Community Antenna Service, Inc. v. Public Service Commission
633 S.E.2d 779 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 2006)
1 case citations

Source Credit

History

(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title VI, §622, as added Pub. L. 98–549, §2, Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2787; amended Pub. L. 102–385, §14, Oct. 5, 1992, 106 Stat. 1489; Pub. L. 104–104, title III, §303(b), Feb. 8, 1996, 110 Stat. 125.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

References in Text
This chapter, referred to in subsec. (h)(1), was in the original "this Act", meaning act June 19, 1934, ch. 652, 48 Stat. 1064, known as the Communications Act of 1934, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 609 of this title and Tables.

Amendments
1996—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 104–104 inserted "to provide cable services" before period at end of first sentence.
1992—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 102–385 amended subsec. (c) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (c) read as follows: "A cable operator may pass through to subscribers the amount of any increase in a franchise fee, unless the franchising authority demonstrates that the rate structure specified in the franchise reflects all costs of franchise fees and so notifies the cable operator in writing."

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1992 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 102–385 effective 60 days after Oct. 5, 1992, see section 28 of Pub. L. 102–385, set out as a note under section 325 of this title.

Effective Date
Section effective 60 days after Oct. 30, 1984, except where otherwise expressly provided, see section 9(a) of Pub. L. 98–549, set out as a note under section 521 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 U.S.C. § 542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/47/542.