FEDERAL · 47 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER IV—PROCEDURAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS
Order for payment of money; petition for enforcement; procedure; order of Commission as prima facie evidence; costs; attorneys' fees
47 U.S.C. § 407
Title47 — Telecommunications
ChapterSUBCHAPTER IV—PROCEDURAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS
This text of 47 U.S.C. § 407 (Order for payment of money; petition for enforcement; procedure; order of Commission as prima facie evidence; costs; attorneys' fees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
47 U.S.C. § 407.
Text
If a carrier does not comply with an order for the payment of money within the time limit in such order, the complainant, or any person for whose benefit such order was made, may file in the district court of the United States for the district in which he resides or in which is located the principal operating office of the carrier, or through which the line of the carrier runs, or in any State court of general jurisdiction having jurisdiction of the parties, a petition setting forth briefly the causes for which he claims damages, and the order of the Commission in the premises. Such suit in the district court of the United States shall proceed in all respects like other civil suits for damages, except that on the trial of such suits the findings and order of the Commission shall be prima f
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Marek v. Chesny
473 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1985)
NetworkIP, LLC v. Federal Communications Commission
548 F.3d 116 (D.C. Circuit, 2008)
Watts v. Securities & Exchange Commission
482 F.3d 501 (D.C. Circuit, 2007)
International Science & Technology Institute, Incorporated v. Inacom Communications, Incorporated
106 F.3d 1146 (Fourth Circuit, 1997)
Chair King, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. Houston Cellular Corporation, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, Karen Laake, Etc.
131 F.3d 507 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)
Erienet, Inc. Sandra MacKenzie John Knauer Frank Mezler, Jr. v. Velocity Net, Inc. Thomas Dylewski Chad Ferenack
156 F.3d 513 (Third Circuit, 1998)
Sherman Gottlieb v. Carnival Corporation, No. 05-2733 Cv
436 F.3d 335 (Second Circuit, 2006)
Harold Nordlicht, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. New York Telephone Company
799 F.2d 859 (Second Circuit, 1986)
Diane W. Oates and Deborah S. Wogan v. Beverly W. Oates, Andrew M. Fishman, Former-Defendant
866 F.2d 203 (Sixth Circuit, 1989)
National Ass'n of State Utility Consumer Advocates v. Federal Communications Commission
457 F.3d 1238 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)
Foster v. Kings Park Central School District
174 F.R.D. 19 (E.D. New York, 1997)
Montgomery & Associates, Inc. v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission and Thomson McKinnon Securities, Inc. And Gilbert Kaap
816 F.2d 783 (D.C. Circuit, 1987)
Foxhall Realty Law Offices, Inc. v. Telecommunications Premium Services, Ltd.
975 F. Supp. 329 (S.D. New York, 1997)
Grumman Corp. v. LTV Corp.
533 F. Supp. 1385 (E.D. New York, 1982)
APCC Services, Inc. v. Sprint Communications Co.
418 F.3d 1238 (D.C. Circuit, 2005)
Citibank, N. A. v. Graphic Scanning Corp. And Graphnet Systems, Inc.
618 F.2d 222 (Second Circuit, 1980)
Murphey v. Lanier
997 F. Supp. 1348 (S.D. California, 1998)
American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. United Artists Payphone Corp.
852 F. Supp. 221 (S.D. New York, 1994)
Simpson Electric Corp. v. Leucadia Inc.
128 A.D.2d 339 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Vance v. Reed
495 F. Supp. 852 (M.D. Tennessee, 1980)
Source Credit
History
(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title IV, §407, 48 Stat. 1095.)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
47 U.S.C. § 407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/47/407.