FEDERAL · 47 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—COMMON CARRIERS
Provision of payphone service
47 U.S.C. § 276
This text of 47 U.S.C. § 276 (Provision of payphone service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
47 U.S.C. § 276.
Text
(a)Nondiscrimination safeguards
After the effective date of the rules prescribed pursuant to subsection (b), any Bell operating company that provides payphone service—
(1)shall not subsidize its payphone service directly or indirectly from its telephone exchange service operations or its exchange access operations; and
(2)shall not prefer or discriminate in favor of its payphone service.
(b)Regulations
In order to promote competition among payphone service providers and promote the widespread deployment of payphone services to the benefit of the general public, within 9 months after February 8, 1996, the Commission shall take all actions necessary (including any reconsideration) to prescribe regulations that—
(A)establish a compensation plan to ensure that all payphone service provide
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sprint Communications Co. v. APCC Services, Inc.
554 U.S. 269 (Supreme Court, 2008)
NetworkIP, LLC v. Federal Communications Commission
548 F.3d 116 (D.C. Circuit, 2008)
Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc.
550 U.S. 45 (Supreme Court, 2007)
Sprint Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, American Public Communications Council, Inc., Intervenors
315 F.3d 369 (D.C. Circuit, 2003)
New Jersey Payphone Association, Inc, a Not for Profit Corporation Organized Under the Laws of New Jersey v. Town of West New York
299 F.3d 235 (Third Circuit, 2002)
Illinois Public Telecommunications Ass'n v. Federal Communications Commission
117 F.3d 555 (D.C. Circuit, 1997)
Global TelLink v. Federal Communications Commission
866 F.3d 397 (D.C. Circuit, 2017)
McGuire v. Ameritech Services, Inc.
253 F. Supp. 2d 988 (S.D. Ohio, 2003)
APCC Services, Inc. v. Sprint Communications Co.
418 F.3d 1238 (D.C. Circuit, 2005)
Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc. v. Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc.
423 F.3d 1056 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
Northwest Public Communications Council ex rel. PSPs A to Z v. Qwest Corp.
379 P.3d 633 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2016)
CARA JONES V. GOOGLE LLC
(Ninth Circuit, 2022)
Source Credit
History
(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title II, §276, as added Pub. L. 104–104, title I, §151(a), Feb. 8, 1996, 10 Stat. 106; amended Pub. L. 117–338, §2(a), Jan. 5, 2023, 136 Stat. 6156.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2023—Subsec. (b)(1)(A). Pub. L. 117–338, §2(a)(1), struck out "per call" before "compensation plan" and "each and every" before "completed intrastate", inserted ", and all rates and charges are just and reasonable," after "fairly compensated" and "or other calling device" after "their payphone", and substituted "communications using" for "call using".
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 117–338, §2(a)(2), inserted "and advanced communications services described in subparagraphs (A), (B), (D), and (E) of section 153(1) of this title" after "inmate telephone service".
Amendments
2023—Subsec. (b)(1)(A). Pub. L. 117–338, §2(a)(1), struck out "per call" before "compensation plan" and "each and every" before "completed intrastate", inserted ", and all rates and charges are just and reasonable," after "fairly compensated" and "or other calling device" after "their payphone", and substituted "communications using" for "call using".
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 117–338, §2(a)(2), inserted "and advanced communications services described in subparagraphs (A), (B), (D), and (E) of section 153(1) of this title" after "inmate telephone service".
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
47 U.S.C. § 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/47/276.