FEDERAL · 47 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—COMMON CARRIERS
Effect on other requirements
47 U.S.C. § 261
This text of 47 U.S.C. § 261 (Effect on other requirements) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
47 U.S.C. § 261.
Text
(a)Commission regulations
Nothing in this part shall be construed to prohibit the Commission from enforcing regulations prescribed prior to February 8, 1996, in fulfilling the requirements of this part, to the extent that such regulations are not inconsistent with the provisions of this part.
(b)Existing State regulations
Nothing in this part shall be construed to prohibit any State commission from enforcing regulations prescribed prior to February 8, 1996, or from prescribing regulations after February 8, 1996, in fulfilling the requirements of this part, if such regulations are not inconsistent with the provisions of this part.
(c)Additional State requirements
Nothing in this part precludes a State from imposing requirements on a telecommunications carrier for intrastate services that
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis v. Trinko, LLP
540 U.S. 398 (Supreme Court, 2004)
BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. Greer
972 S.W.2d 663 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1997)
Iowa Utilities Board v. Federal Communications Commission
120 F.3d 753 (Eighth Circuit, 1997)
Gte North, Inc. v. John G. Strand
209 F.3d 909 (Sixth Circuit, 2000)
Iowa Utilities Board v. F.C.C.
120 F.3d 753 (Eighth Circuit, 1997)
Verizon North, Inc. v. John G. Strand, Chairman John C. Shea, Commissioner and David A. Svanda, Commissioner
309 F.3d 935 (Sixth Circuit, 2002)
At&T Communications of Pacific Northwest, Inc. v. City of Eugene
35 P.3d 1029 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2001)
Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Incorporated v. William D. Mccarty
362 F.3d 378 (Seventh Circuit, 2004)
In Re Qwest's Wholesale Service Quality Standards
702 N.W.2d 246 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2005)
MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Bellsouth Telecommunications Inc.
298 F.3d 1269 (Eleventh Circuit, 2002)
Verizon Maryland, Inc. v. Global Naps, Inc.
377 F.3d 355 (Fourth Circuit, 2004)
Verizon Maryland Inc. v. RCN Telecom Services, Inc.
232 F. Supp. 2d 539 (D. Maryland, 2002)
Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. Bie
340 F.3d 441 (Seventh Circuit, 2003)
Iowa Network Services, Inc. v. Qwest Corp.
385 F. Supp. 2d 850 (S.D. Iowa, 2005)
Verizon North, Inc. v. Strand
140 F. Supp. 2d 803 (W.D. Michigan, 2000)
Global NAPS, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc.
327 F. Supp. 2d 290 (D. Vermont, 2004)
Global NAPs, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc.
454 F.3d 91 (Second Circuit, 2006)
Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. MCIMetro Access Transmission Services, Inc.
323 F.3d 348 (Sixth Circuit, 2003)
Bell Atlantic-Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
763 A.2d 440 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2000)
In Re Qwest's Wholesale Service Quality Standards
678 N.W.2d 58 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 2004)
Source Credit
History
(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title II, §261, as added Pub. L. 104–104, title I, §101(a), Feb. 8, 1996, 110 Stat. 79.)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
47 U.S.C. § 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/47/261.