FEDERAL · 47 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—COMMON CARRIERS

Access by persons with disabilities

47 U.S.C. § 255
Title47Telecommunications
ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—COMMON CARRIERS
PartII

This text of 47 U.S.C. § 255 (Access by persons with disabilities) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
47 U.S.C. § 255.

Text

(a)Definitions As used in this section— The term "disability" has the meaning given to it by section 12102(2)(A) 1 of title 42. The term "readily achievable" has the meaning given to it by section 12181(9) of title 42.
(b)Manufacturing A manufacturer of telecommunications equipment or customer premises equipment shall ensure that the equipment is designed, developed, and fabricated to be accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities, if readily achievable.
(c)Telecommunications services A provider of telecommunications service shall ensure that the service is accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities, if readily achievable.
(d)Compatibility Whenever the requirements of subsections (b) and (c) are not readily achievable, such a manufacturer or provider shall

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

At & T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. v. City of Dallas
8 F. Supp. 2d 582 (N.D. Texas, 1998)
44 case citations
At&T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. v. City of Austin, Tex.
975 F. Supp. 928 (W.D. Texas, 1997)
34 case citations
TCG New York, Inc. v. City of White Plains
305 F.3d 67 (Second Circuit, 2002)
32 case citations
Spectra Communications Group v. City of Cameron, Missouri
806 F.3d 1113 (Eighth Circuit, 2015)
29 case citations
Qwest Communications Corp. v. City of Berkeley
202 F. Supp. 2d 1085 (N.D. California, 2001)
13 case citations
MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Southern New England Telephone Co.
27 F. Supp. 2d 326 (D. Connecticut, 1998)
10 case citations
Fair v. Verizon Communications Inc.
621 F. App'x 52 (Second Circuit, 2015)
10 case citations
Pacific Bell v. Cook Telecom, Inc.
197 F.3d 1236 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)
7 case citations
G v. Fay Sch., Inc.
282 F. Supp. 3d 381 (District of Columbia, 2017)
6 case citations
At & T Communications of California, Inc. v. Pacific Bell
60 F. Supp. 2d 997 (N.D. California, 1999)
4 case citations
TCG Detroit v. Dearborn
(Sixth Circuit, 2000)
Baidan v. Romanovska
(N.D. California, 2024)
Mapes v. Cable One
(N.D. Indiana, 2022)

Source Credit

History

(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title II, §255, as added Pub. L. 104–104, title I, §101(a), Feb. 8, 1996, 110 Stat. 75.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

References in Text
Section 12102 of title 42, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), was amended generally by Pub. L. 110–325, §4(a), Sept. 25, 2008, 122 Stat. 3555, and, as so amended, provisions formerly appearing in par. (2)(A) are now contained in par. (1)(A).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 U.S.C. § 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/47/255.