FEDERAL · 47 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—COMMON CARRIERS

Commission authorized to prescribe just and reasonable charges; penalties for violations

47 U.S.C. § 205
Title47Telecommunications
ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—COMMON CARRIERS
PartI

This text of 47 U.S.C. § 205 (Commission authorized to prescribe just and reasonable charges; penalties for violations) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
47 U.S.C. § 205.

Text

(a)Whenever, after full opportunity for hearing, upon a complaint or under an order for investigation and hearing made by the Commission on its own initiative, the Commission shall be of opinion that any charge, classification, regulation, or practice of any carrier or carriers is or will be in violation of any of the provisions of this chapter, the Commission is authorized and empowered to determine and prescribe what will be the just and reasonable charge or the maximum or minimum, or maximum and minimum, charge or charges to be thereafter observed, and what classification, regulation, or practice is or will be just, fair, and reasonable, to be thereafter followed, and to make an order that the carrier or carriers shall cease and desist from such violation to the extent that the Commiss

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fax Telecommunicaciones Inc. v. At&t, Michael Gilmartin and Richard Stotts
138 F.3d 479 (Second Circuit, 1998)
146 case citations
Moss v. Civil Aeronautics Board
430 F.2d 891 (D.C. Circuit, 1970)
41 case citations
MCI Communications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
462 F. Supp. 1072 (N.D. Illinois, 1978)
33 case citations
Hi-Tech Furnace Systems, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
224 F.3d 781 (D.C. Circuit, 2000)
33 case citations
American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Federal Communications Commission
572 F.2d 17 (Second Circuit, 1978)
26 case citations
New York Telephone Co. v. Federal Communications Commission
631 F.2d 1059 (Second Circuit, 1980)
25 case citations
Litton Systems, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
487 F. Supp. 942 (S.D. New York, 1980)
22 case citations
Essential Communication System, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
446 F. Supp. 1090 (D. New Jersey, 1978)
14 case citations
National Ass'n of Motor Bus Owners v. Federal Communications Commission
460 F.2d 561 (Second Circuit, 1972)
13 case citations
People of State of California v. Federal Communications Commission
75 F.3d 1350 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
10 case citations
APCC Services, Inc. v. Sprint Communications Co.
418 F.3d 1238 (D.C. Circuit, 2005)
10 case citations
Phonetele, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
664 F.2d 716 (Ninth Circuit, 1981)
9 case citations
Aeronautical Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
642 F.2d 1221 (D.C. Circuit, 1980)
8 case citations

Source Credit

History

(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title II, §205, 48 Stat. 1072; Pub. L. 101–239, title III, §3002(c), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2131.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

References in Text
This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original "this Act", meaning act June 19, 1934, ch. 652, 48 Stat. 1064, known as the Communications Act of 1934, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 609 of this title and Tables.

Amendments
1989—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 101–239 substituted "$12,000" for "$1,000".

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 U.S.C. § 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/47/205.