FEDERAL · 47 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—COMMON CARRIERS
Schedules of charges
47 U.S.C. § 203
This text of 47 U.S.C. § 203 (Schedules of charges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
47 U.S.C. § 203.
Text
(a)Filing; public display
Every common carrier, except connecting carriers, shall, within such reasonable time as the Commission shall designate, file with the Commission and print and keep open for public inspection schedules showing all charges for itself and its connecting carriers for interstate and foreign wire or radio communication between the different points on its own system, and between points on its own system and points on the system of its connecting carriers or points on the system of any other carrier subject to this chapter when a through route has been established, whether such charges are joint or separate, and showing the classifications, practices, and regulations affecting such charges. Such schedules shall contain such other information, and be printed in such form,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
512 U.S. 218 (Supreme Court, 1994)
American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Central Office Telephone, Inc.
524 U.S. 214 (Supreme Court, 1998)
Tenore v. AT&T Wireless Services
962 P.2d 104 (Washington Supreme Court, 1998)
Priscilla Hill v. BellSouth Telecommunications
364 F.3d 1308 (Eleventh Circuit, 2004)
Weinberg v. Sprint Corp.
801 A.2d 281 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2002)
Kemp v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
393 F.3d 1354 (Eleventh Circuit, 2004)
National Ass'n of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Federal Communications Commission
737 F.2d 1095 (D.C. Circuit, 1984)
Tomi White Bryan, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Bellsouth Communications, Incorporated
377 F.3d 424 (Fourth Circuit, 2004)
Illinois Public Telecommunications Ass'n v. Federal Communications Commission
117 F.3d 555 (D.C. Circuit, 1997)
MCI Worldcom, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
209 F.3d 760 (D.C. Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Al Harris
334 F.2d 460 (Second Circuit, 1964)
Cellphone Termination Fee Cases
193 Cal. App. 4th 298 (California Court of Appeal, 2011)
United States v. Henry B. McFarland
371 F.2d 701 (Second Circuit, 1966)
American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Federal Communications Commission
572 F.2d 17 (Second Circuit, 1978)
98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7250, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,057 Steve Romine, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Diversified Collection Services, Inc., and Western Union
155 F.3d 1142 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
Markle Interests, L.L.C. v. United States Fish & Wildlife Service
827 F.3d 452 (Fifth Circuit, 2016)
Sound, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
631 F.2d 1324 (Eighth Circuit, 1980)
Frenkel v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
327 F. Supp. 954 (D. Maryland, 1971)
Telecommunications Research & Action Center ex rel. Checknoff v. Allnet Communication Services, Inc.
806 F.2d 1093 (D.C. Circuit, 1986)
Lo Shippers Action Committee v. Interstate Commerce Commission
857 F.2d 802 (D.C. Circuit, 1988)
Source Credit
History
(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title II, §203, 48 Stat. 1070; Pub. L. 94–376, §1, Aug. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1080; Pub. L. 101–239, title III, §3002(b), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2131; Pub. L. 101–396, §7, Sept. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 850.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
This chapter, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (c), was in the original "this Act", meaning act June 19, 1934, ch. 652, 48 Stat. 1064, known as the Communications Act of 1934, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 609 of this title and Tables.
Amendments
1990—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 101–396 substituted "one hundred and twenty days" for "ninety days" in pars. (1) and (2).
1989—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 101–239 substituted "$6,000" for "$500" and "$300" for "$25".
1976—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 94–376 designated existing provisions as par. (1), substituted "after ninety days notice" for "after thirty days' notice", and struck out provision that the Commission may, in its discretion and for good cause shown, modify the requirements made by or under authority of this section in particular instances or by a general order applicable to special circumstances or conditions, and added par. (2).
References in Text
This chapter, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (c), was in the original "this Act", meaning act June 19, 1934, ch. 652, 48 Stat. 1064, known as the Communications Act of 1934, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 609 of this title and Tables.
Amendments
1990—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 101–396 substituted "one hundred and twenty days" for "ninety days" in pars. (1) and (2).
1989—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 101–239 substituted "$6,000" for "$500" and "$300" for "$25".
1976—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 94–376 designated existing provisions as par. (1), substituted "after ninety days notice" for "after thirty days' notice", and struck out provision that the Commission may, in its discretion and for good cause shown, modify the requirements made by or under authority of this section in particular instances or by a general order applicable to special circumstances or conditions, and added par. (2).
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
47 U.S.C. § 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/47/203.