FEDERAL · 46 U.S.C. · Chapter 85
State regulation of pilots
46 U.S.C. § 8501
Title46 — Shipping
Chapter85 — PILOTS
This text of 46 U.S.C. § 8501 (State regulation of pilots) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
46 U.S.C. § 8501.
Text
(a)Except as otherwise provided in this subtitle, pilots in the bays, rivers, harbors, and ports of the United States shall be regulated only in conformity with the laws of the States.
(b)The master of a vessel entering or leaving a port on waters that are a boundary between 2 States, and that is required to have a pilot under this section, may employ a pilot licensed or authorized by the laws of either of the 2 States.
(c)A State may not adopt a regulation or provision that discriminates in the rate of pilotage or half-pilotage between vessels sailing between the ports of one State and vessels sailing between the ports of different States, or against vessels because of their means of propulsion, or against public vessels of the United States.
(d)A State may not adopt a regulation or p
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Interoceanica Corporation and Turbana Corporation v. Sound Pilots, Inc.
107 F.3d 86 (Second Circuit, 1997)
Gillis v. State of Louisiana
294 F.3d 755 (Fifth Circuit, 2002)
Interport Pilots Agency, Inc. v. Sammis
14 F.3d 133 (Second Circuit, 1994)
Helen Ehret Bach, Eugene G. Bach, Iii, Janet B. Lashley v. Trident Steamship Company, Inc.
920 F.2d 322 (Fifth Circuit, 1991)
Ball v. Interoceanica Corp.
71 F.3d 73 (Second Circuit, 1995)
Evans v. United Arab Shipping Co. S.A.G.
4 F.3d 207 (Third Circuit, 1993)
Harry J. Williams v. United States Department of Transportation and United States Coast Guard
781 F.2d 1573 (Eleventh Circuit, 1986)
Leson v. State
864 P.2d 384 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1994)
Marquette Trans v. Navigation Mrtm
87 F.4th 678 (Fifth Circuit, 2023)
Sweatt v. Florida Board of Pilot Commissioners
776 F. Supp. 1538 (M.D. Florida, 1991)
United States v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
440 F. Supp. 2d 24 (D. Massachusetts, 2006)
Ball v. Interoceanica Corp.
867 F. Supp. 226 (S.D. New York, 1994)
Wood v. Amerada Hess Corp.
845 F. Supp. 130 (S.D. New York, 1994)
Interport Pilots Agency, Inc. v. Sammis
774 F. Supp. 734 (E.D. New York, 1991)
Gordon Westergren, Sandy Westergren, Richard Helmle, Carole Helmle, Chris Miller, Kimberly Miller, Peter Sundt, and Brian Johnson v. Houston Pilots Association
566 S.W.3d 7 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2018)
Spence v. Southeastern Alaska Pilots' Ass'n
789 F. Supp. 1007 (D. Alaska, 1990)
Hochstetler v. Board of Pilot Commissioners
6 Cal. App. 4th 1659 (California Court of Appeal, 1992)
Untitled New York Attorney General Opinion
(New York Attorney General Reports, 2016)
Schoenlank v. Kurz-Moran Shipping Agency
847 F. Supp. 311 (S.D. New York, 1994)
Matthew Hight v. DHS
(D.C. Circuit, 2025)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 553; Pub. L. 98–557, §29(e), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2874.)
Editorial Notes
Section 8501 establishes the general proposition that the States regulate pilots in the bays, rivers, harbors, and ports of the United States, unless otherwise specifically provided by law.
Subsection (a) states this general proposition and uses the word "only" for emphasis on this point. Further, except as specifically provided in law, the Committee intends that this chapter not be construed to annul or affect any regulation established by the laws of a State requiring a vessel entering or leaving a port in that State to employ a pilot licensed or authorized by the laws of that State. In at least two places in current law, this general proposition is stated in both a positive and negative manner. The Committee intends to consolidate those separate statements into one provision to avoid ambiguity and redundancy.
Subsections (b) and (c) contain provisions regarding pilotage in waters between two States.
Subsection (d) prohibits a State from requiring a State licensed pilot on certain coastwise vessels.
Subsection (e) voids any regulation or provision violating this section.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1984—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–557 substituted "subtitle" for "part".
Subsection (a) states this general proposition and uses the word "only" for emphasis on this point. Further, except as specifically provided in law, the Committee intends that this chapter not be construed to annul or affect any regulation established by the laws of a State requiring a vessel entering or leaving a port in that State to employ a pilot licensed or authorized by the laws of that State. In at least two places in current law, this general proposition is stated in both a positive and negative manner. The Committee intends to consolidate those separate statements into one provision to avoid ambiguity and redundancy.
Subsections (b) and (c) contain provisions regarding pilotage in waters between two States.
Subsection (d) prohibits a State from requiring a State licensed pilot on certain coastwise vessels.
Subsection (e) voids any regulation or provision violating this section.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1984—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–557 substituted "subtitle" for "part".
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
46 U.S.C. § 8501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/46/8501.