FEDERAL · 46 U.S.C. · Chapter 43
Federal preemption
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
Unless permitted by the Secretary under section 4305 of this title, a State or political subdivision of a State may not establish, continue in effect, or enforce a law or regulation establishing a recreational vessel or associated equipment performance or other safety standard or imposing a requirement for associated equipment (except insofar as the State or political subdivision may, in the absence of the Secretary's disapproval, regulate the carrying or use of marine safety articles to meet uniquely hazardous conditions or circumstances within the State) that is not identical to a regulation prescribed under section 4302 of this title.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
46 U.S.C. § 4306 (Federal preemption) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sprietsma v. Mercury Marine
537 U.S. 51 (Supreme Court, 2002)
Northwest, Inc. v. Ginsberg
134 S. Ct. 1422 (Supreme Court, 2014)
Lewis v. Brunswick Corporation
107 F.3d 1494 (Eleventh Circuit, 1997)
Sikkelee Ex Rel. Estate of Sikkelee v. Precision Airmotive Corp.
822 F.3d 680 (Third Circuit, 2016)
Ramsey v. Lucky Stores, Inc.
853 S.W.2d 623 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1993)
Sprietsma v. Mercury Marine
757 N.E.2d 75 (Illinois Supreme Court, 2001)
Brown v. United Airlines, Inc.
720 F.3d 60 (First Circuit, 2013)
Personal Watercraft Coalition v. Marin County Board of Supervisors
122 Cal. Rptr. 2d 425 (California Court of Appeal, 2002)
Shields v. Outboard Marine Corp.
776 F. Supp. 1579 (M.D. Georgia, 1991)
Joan Carstensen v. Brunswick Corporation, Mercury Marine Corporation, and Sea Ray Boats, Inc.
49 F.3d 430 (Eighth Circuit, 1995)
Farner v. Brunswick Corp.
607 N.E.2d 562 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1992)
Roberts v. United Healthcare Services, Inc.
2 Cal. App. 5th 132 (California Court of Appeal, 2016)
Davis v. Brunswick Corp.
854 F. Supp. 1574 (N.D. Georgia, 1994)
Cotton v. Starcare Medical Group, Inc.
183 Cal. App. 4th 437 (California Court of Appeal, 2010)
Moss v. Outboard Marine Corp.
915 F. Supp. 183 (E.D. California, 1996)
Ard v. Jensen
996 S.W.2d 594 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1999)
Moore v. Brunswick Bowling & Billiards Corp.
853 S.W.2d 842 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1993)
Folsom v. Kawasaki Motors Corp. U.S.A.
509 F. Supp. 2d 1364 (M.D. Georgia, 2007)
Becker v. U.S. Marine Co.
943 P.2d 700 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1997)
Diamond Offshore Co. v. Survival Systems International, Inc.
902 F. Supp. 2d 912 (S.D. Texas, 2012)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 531.)
Editorial Notes
Section 4306 establishes the Federal preemption of recreational boating standards and requirements. A State or a political subdivision may not establish, continue, or enforce a law or regulation establishing a performance or other safety standard that is not identical to a Federal standard. The Secretary may grant an exemption to a State when the State requirement is one that is needed to meet uniquely hazardous conditions or circumstances within a State. This is to provide uniform standards without the imposition of excessive special requirements by individual States.