FEDERAL · 46 U.S.C. · Chapter 405
General rate and tariff requirements
46 U.S.C. § 40501
Title46 — Shipping
Chapter405 — TARIFFS, SERVICE CONTRACTS, REFUNDS, AND WAIVERS
This text of 46 U.S.C. § 40501 (General rate and tariff requirements) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
46 U.S.C. § 40501.
Text
(a)Automated Tariff System.—
(1)In general.—Each common carrier and conference shall keep open to public inspection in an automated tariff system, tariffs showing all its rates, charges, classifications, rules, and practices between all points or ports on its own route and on any through transportation route that has been established. However, a common carrier is not required to state separately or otherwise reveal in tariffs the inland divisions of a through rate.
(2)Exceptions.—Paragraph (1) does not apply with respect to bulk cargo, forest products, recycled metal scrap, new assembled motor vehicles, waste paper, or paper waste.
(b)Contents of Tariffs.—A tariff under subsection (a) shall—
(1)state the places between which cargo will be carried;
(2)list each classification of cargo
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ondimar Transportes Maritimos v. Beatty Street Properties, Inc.
555 F.3d 184 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)
Lexington Insurance v. S.H.R.M. Catering Services, Inc.
567 F.3d 182 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)
Cooper/T. Smith Stevedoring Co. v. State
730 S.E.2d 168 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)
KLM Consulting LLC v. Panacea Shipping Company, Inc.
(S.D. New York, 2023)
Red Hook Container Terminal v. South Pacific Shipping Co. Ltd
(Second Circuit, 2021)
In re: M/V Yochow
(S.D. Texas, 2020)
Pt. Jawamanis Rafinasi v. Coastal Cargo Com
552 F. App'x 394 (Fifth Circuit, 2014)
Lexington Ins. Co. v. SHRM CATERING SERVICES, INC.
567 F.3d 182 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)
cooper/t.smith Stevedoring Company v. State of Ga
(Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)
IFG Port Holdings LLC v. South Louisiana Rail Facility LLC
(W.D. Louisiana, 2025)
BRM Trades, LLC v. All-Ways Forwarding Int'l Inc.
(S.D. New York, 2022)
Taian Insurance Co., Ltd. v. Bondex Logistics Co., Ltd.
(S.D. New York, 2024)
Prospero Tire Export, Inc. v. Maersk Line, Ltd
(S.D. New York, 2019)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 109–304, §7, Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1532.)
Editorial Notes
In subsection (b)(3), the words "ocean freight forwarder" are substituted for "ocean transportation intermediary, as defined in section 1702(17)(A) of this Appendix" because the definition of "ocean transportation intermediary" in section 1702(17)(A) contains a definition of "ocean freight forwarder" which is restated as a separate definition.
In subsection (e), the word "calendar" is omitted as unnecessary.
In subsection (f)(1), the words "subject to section 1709(d) of this Appendix" are omitted as unnecessary.
In subsection (e), the word "calendar" is omitted as unnecessary.
In subsection (f)(1), the words "subject to section 1709(d) of this Appendix" are omitted as unnecessary.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
46 U.S.C. § 40501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/46/40501.