FEDERAL · 46 U.S.C. · Chapter 403
Application
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
(a)Ocean Common Carrier Agreements.—This part applies to an agreement between or among ocean common carriers to—
(1)discuss, fix, or regulate transportation rates, including through rates, cargo space accommodations, and other conditions of service;
(2)pool or apportion traffic, revenues, earnings, or losses;
(3)allot ports or regulate the number and character of voyages between ports;
(4)regulate the volume or character of cargo or passenger traffic to be carried;
(5)engage in an exclusive, preferential, or cooperative working arrangement between themselves or with a marine terminal operator;
(6)control, regulate, or prevent competition in international ocean transportation; or
(7)discuss and agree on any matter related to a service contract.
(b)Marine Terminal Operator Agreement
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
46 U.S.C. § 40301 (Application) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Arthur West v. Seattle Port Commission
380 P.3d 82 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2016)
Regal-Beloit Corp. v. Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd.
557 F.3d 985 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
Federal Maritime Com'n v. City of Los Angeles, California
607 F. Supp. 2d 192 (District of Columbia, 2009)
MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. v. FMC
141 F.4th 222 (D.C. Circuit, 2025)
MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, VS. NIPPON YUSEN KABUSHIKI KAISHA (L-6325-18, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
(New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2020)
Federal Maritime Commission v. City of Los Angeles, California
(District of Columbia, 2009)
Levin Richmond Terminal Corporation v. City of Richmond
(N.D. California, 2020)
REGAL-BELOIT CORP. v. KAWASAKI Kisen Kaish
(Ninth Circuit, 2009)
Regal-Beloit Corporation v. Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd.
(Ninth Circuit, 2009)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 109–304, §7, Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1528.)