FEDERAL · 43 U.S.C. · Chapter 18
Resurveys or retracements to mark boundaries of undisposed lands
43 U.S.C. § 772
Title43 — Public Lands
Chapter18 — SURVEY OF PUBLIC LANDS
This text of 43 U.S.C. § 772 (Resurveys or retracements to mark boundaries of undisposed lands) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
43 U.S.C. § 772.
Text
The Secretary of the Interior may, as of March 3, 1909, in his discretion cause to be made, as he may deem wise under the rectangular system on that date provided by law, such resurveys or retracements of the surveys of public lands as, after full investigation, he may deem essential to properly mark the boundaries of the public lands remaining undisposed of: Provided, That no such resurvey or retracement shall be so executed as to impair the bona fide rights or claims of any claimant, entryman, or owner of lands affected by such resurvey or retracement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Ruby Company, a Utah Corporation
588 F.2d 697 (Ninth Circuit, 1978)
United States v. James P. Doyle and Florence A. Doyle
468 F.2d 633 (Tenth Circuit, 1972)
United States v. John Hudspeth, John Hudspeth v. United States
384 F.2d 683 (Ninth Circuit, 1967)
United States v. Paul E. Reimann, and Maybeth Farr Reimann, His Wife
504 F.2d 135 (Tenth Circuit, 1974)
Frank Lujan v. United States Department of the Interior and James G. Watt, Secretary
673 F.2d 1165 (Tenth Circuit, 1982)
Pueblo of Taos v. Andrus
475 F. Supp. 359 (District of Columbia, 1979)
Sweeten v. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service
684 F.2d 679 (Tenth Circuit, 1982)
Fadem v. United States
13 Cl. Ct. 328 (Court of Claims, 1987)
Beaver Creek Ranch, L.P. v. Gordman Leverich Ltd. Liability Ltd. Partnership
226 P.3d 1155 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2009)
United States v. Estate of St. Clair
819 F.3d 1254 (Tenth Circuit, 2016)
Zager v. United States
256 F. Supp. 396 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1966)
Metropolitan Water Dist. of Southern Cal. v. United States
628 F. Supp. 1018 (S.D. California, 1986)
Adams v. United States
687 F. Supp. 1479 (D. Nevada, 1988)
Fadem v. United States
791 F.2d 1381 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)
Benjamin F. Maplesden and Anne W. Maplesden v. United States of America, and Jon E. Riewerts
764 F.2d 1290 (Ninth Circuit, 1985)
Mannatt v. United States
48 Fed. Cl. 148 (Federal Claims, 2000)
United States v. Lemon
632 F. Supp. 431 (D. Colorado, 1986)
Thomas v. Bremer
946 P.2d 800 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1997)
Keller v. United States
6 Cl. Ct. 724 (Court of Claims, 1984)
United States v. MacMillan
331 F. Supp. 435 (D. Nevada, 1971)
Source Credit
History
(Mar. 3, 1909, ch. 271, 35 Stat. 845; June 25, 1910, No. 40, 36 Stat. 884; Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §705(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2792.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1976—Pub. L. 94–579 struck out proviso authorizing that not more than 20 per centum of relevant appropriations be used for resurveys and retracements under this section.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1976 Amendment
Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §705(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2792, provided that the amendment made by section 705(a) is effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976.
Savings Provision
Amendment by Pub. L. 94–579 not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
Amendments
1976—Pub. L. 94–579 struck out proviso authorizing that not more than 20 per centum of relevant appropriations be used for resurveys and retracements under this section.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1976 Amendment
Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §705(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2792, provided that the amendment made by section 705(a) is effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976.
Savings Provision
Amendment by Pub. L. 94–579 not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
43 U.S.C. § 772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/43/772.