FEDERAL · 43 U.S.C. · Chapter 18

Resurveys or retracements to mark boundaries of undisposed lands

43 U.S.C. § 772
Title43Public Lands
Chapter18 — SURVEY OF PUBLIC LANDS

This text of 43 U.S.C. § 772 (Resurveys or retracements to mark boundaries of undisposed lands) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
43 U.S.C. § 772.

Text

The Secretary of the Interior may, as of March 3, 1909, in his discretion cause to be made, as he may deem wise under the rectangular system on that date provided by law, such resurveys or retracements of the surveys of public lands as, after full investigation, he may deem essential to properly mark the boundaries of the public lands remaining undisposed of: Provided, That no such resurvey or retracement shall be so executed as to impair the bona fide rights or claims of any claimant, entryman, or owner of lands affected by such resurvey or retracement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Ruby Company, a Utah Corporation
588 F.2d 697 (Ninth Circuit, 1978)
130 case citations
United States v. James P. Doyle and Florence A. Doyle
468 F.2d 633 (Tenth Circuit, 1972)
26 case citations
United States v. John Hudspeth, John Hudspeth v. United States
384 F.2d 683 (Ninth Circuit, 1967)
15 case citations
United States v. Paul E. Reimann, and Maybeth Farr Reimann, His Wife
504 F.2d 135 (Tenth Circuit, 1974)
14 case citations
Pueblo of Taos v. Andrus
475 F. Supp. 359 (District of Columbia, 1979)
11 case citations
Sweeten v. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service
684 F.2d 679 (Tenth Circuit, 1982)
7 case citations
Fadem v. United States
13 Cl. Ct. 328 (Court of Claims, 1987)
7 case citations
Beaver Creek Ranch, L.P. v. Gordman Leverich Ltd. Liability Ltd. Partnership
226 P.3d 1155 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2009)
7 case citations
United States v. Estate of St. Clair
819 F.3d 1254 (Tenth Circuit, 2016)
7 case citations
Zager v. United States
256 F. Supp. 396 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1966)
7 case citations
Metropolitan Water Dist. of Southern Cal. v. United States
628 F. Supp. 1018 (S.D. California, 1986)
6 case citations
Adams v. United States
687 F. Supp. 1479 (D. Nevada, 1988)
6 case citations
Fadem v. United States
791 F.2d 1381 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)
4 case citations
Mannatt v. United States
48 Fed. Cl. 148 (Federal Claims, 2000)
3 case citations
United States v. Lemon
632 F. Supp. 431 (D. Colorado, 1986)
2 case citations
Thomas v. Bremer
946 P.2d 800 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1997)
1 case citations
Keller v. United States
6 Cl. Ct. 724 (Court of Claims, 1984)
1 case citations
United States v. MacMillan
331 F. Supp. 435 (D. Nevada, 1971)
1 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Mar. 3, 1909, ch. 271, 35 Stat. 845; June 25, 1910, No. 40, 36 Stat. 884; Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §705(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2792.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1976—Pub. L. 94–579 struck out proviso authorizing that not more than 20 per centum of relevant appropriations be used for resurveys and retracements under this section.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1976 Amendment
Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §705(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2792, provided that the amendment made by section 705(a) is effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976.

Savings Provision
Amendment by Pub. L. 94–579 not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 U.S.C. § 772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/43/772.