FEDERAL · 43 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER XII—CONTRACTS WITH STATE IRRIGATION DISTRICTS FOR PAYMENT OF CHARGES
Authority to contract with irrigation district
43 U.S.C. § 511
Title43 — Public Lands
ChapterSUBCHAPTER XII—CONTRACTS WITH STATE IRRIGATION DISTRICTS FOR PAYMENT OF CHARGES
This text of 43 U.S.C. § 511 (Authority to contract with irrigation district) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
43 U.S.C. § 511.
Text
In carrying out the purposes of the Act of June 17, 1902 (32 Stat. 388), and Acts amendatory thereof and supplementary thereto and known as the reclamation law, the Secretary of the Interior may enter into contract with any legally organized irrigation district whereby such irrigation district shall agree to pay the moneys required to be paid to the United States, and in such event water-right applications on the part of landowners and entrymen, in the discretion of the Secretary of the Interior, may be dispensed with. In the event of such contract being made with an irrigation district, the Secretary of the Interior, in his discretion, may contract that the payments, both for the construction of irrigation works and for operation and maintenance, on the part of the district shall be made
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bryant v. Yellen
447 U.S. 352 (Supreme Court, 1980)
Klamath Irrigation District v. United States
67 Fed. Cl. 504 (Federal Claims, 2005)
Orchards v. United States
4 Cl. Ct. 601 (Court of Claims, 1984)
Del Puerto Water District v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation
271 F. Supp. 2d 1224 (E.D. California, 2003)
United States v. Imperial Irrigation District
559 F.2d 509 (Ninth Circuit, 1977)
San Luis Unit Food Producers v. United States
772 F. Supp. 2d 1210 (E.D. California, 2011)
Westlands Water District v. United States
153 F. Supp. 2d 1133 (E.D. California, 2001)
Middle Rio Grande Water Users Ass'n v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy Dist.
258 P.2d 391 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1953)
United States v. Imperial Irrigation District
322 F. Supp. 11 (S.D. California, 1971)
Barcellos & Wolfsen, Inc. v. Westlands Water District
491 F. Supp. 263 (E.D. California, 1980)
Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority v. United States Department of the Interior
819 F. Supp. 2d 956 (E.D. California, 2011)
Yellen v. Hickel
352 F. Supp. 1300 (S.D. California, 1972)
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. United States Department of Interior
637 F. Supp. 2d 777 (E.D. California, 2008)
Central Arizona Irrigation & Drainage District v. Lujan
764 F. Supp. 582 (D. Arizona, 1991)
East Columbia Basin Irrigation District v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
946 F.2d 1550 (D.C. Circuit, 1991)
Concerned Irrigators v. Belle Fourche Irrigation District
235 F.3d 1139 (Eighth Circuit, 2001)
Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District v. United States
88 Fed. Cl. 636 (Federal Claims, 2009)
City of Fresno v. United States
(Federal Claims, 2020)
CENTRAL ARIZONA IRR. AND DRAINAGE DIST. v. Lujan
764 F. Supp. 582 (D. Arizona, 1991)
Westlands Water Dist. v. All Persons Interested
(California Court of Appeal, 2023)
Source Credit
History
(May 15, 1922, ch. 190, §1, 42 Stat. 541.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
Act of June 17, 1902, referred to in text, is popularly known as the Reclamation Act, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 371 of this title and Tables.
References in Text
Act of June 17, 1902, referred to in text, is popularly known as the Reclamation Act, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 371 of this title and Tables.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
43 U.S.C. § 511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/43/511.