FEDERAL · 43 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER V—RIGHTS-OF-WAY
Existing right-of-way or right-of-use unaffected; exceptions; rights-of-way for railroad and appurtenant communication facilities; applicability of existing terms and conditions
43 U.S.C. § 1769
Title43 — Public Lands
ChapterSUBCHAPTER V—RIGHTS-OF-WAY
This text of 43 U.S.C. § 1769 (Existing right-of-way or right-of-use unaffected; exceptions; rights-of-way for railroad and appurtenant communication facilities; applicability of existing terms and conditions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
43 U.S.C. § 1769.
Text
(a)Nothing in this subchapter shall have the effect of terminating any right-of-way or right-of-use heretofore issued, granted, or permitted. However, with the consent of the holder thereof, the Secretary concerned may cancel such a right-of-way or right-of-use and in its stead issue a right-of-way pursuant to the provisions of this subchapter.
(b)When the Secretary concerned issues a right-of-way under this subchapter for a railroad and appurtenant communication facilities in connection with a realinement of a railroad on lands under his jurisdiction by virtue of a right-of-way granted by the United States, he may, when he considers it to be in the public interest and the lands involved are not within an incorporated community and are of approximately equal value, notwithstanding the pr
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sierra Club v. Hodel
848 F.2d 1068 (Tenth Circuit, 1988)
Western Aggregates, Inc. v. County of Yuba
130 Cal. Rptr. 2d 436 (California Court of Appeal, 2002)
Kane County, Utah v. United States
928 F.3d 877 (Tenth Circuit, 2019)
Great Old Broads for Wildernes v. Abigail Kimbell
709 F.3d 836 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
Adams v. United States
3 F.3d 1254 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
Humboldt County v. United States
684 F.2d 1276 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)
Paul G. Shultz v. Department of Army, United States of America
10 F.3d 649 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
CITY & COUNTY OF DENVER, ETC. v. Bergland
517 F. Supp. 155 (D. Colorado, 1981)
Bijou Irrigation District v. Empire Club
804 P.2d 175 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1991)
Friends of Panamint Valley v. Kempthorne
499 F. Supp. 2d 1165 (E.D. California, 2007)
Fitzgerald v. United States
932 F. Supp. 1195 (D. Arizona, 1996)
Bassett, New Mexico LLC v. United States
55 Fed. Cl. 63 (Federal Claims, 2002)
Western Watersheds Project v. Matejko
468 F.3d 1099 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Estate of E. Wayne Hage
810 F.3d 712 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
Kane County v. United States
94 F.4th 1017 (Tenth Circuit, 2024)
Nemeth v. Shoshone County
453 P.3d 844 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2019)
American Independence Mines & Minerals Co. v. United States Department of Agriculture
733 F. Supp. 2d 1241 (D. Idaho, 2010)
Adams v. United States
687 F. Supp. 1479 (D. Nevada, 1988)
Elko County Board of Supervisors v. Glickman
909 F. Supp. 759 (D. Nevada, 1995)
United States v. Balliet
133 F. Supp. 2d 1120 (W.D. Arkansas, 2001)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 94–579, title V, §509, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2781.)
Editorial Notes
Executive Documents
Transfer of Functions
See note set out under section 1763 of this title.
Transfer of Functions
See note set out under section 1763 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
43 U.S.C. § 1769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/43/1769.