FEDERAL · 42 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER I—GENERALLY
Traditional Indian religious use of peyote
42 U.S.C. § 1996a
Title42 — The Public Health and Welfare
ChapterSUBCHAPTER I—GENERALLY
This text of 42 U.S.C. § 1996a (Traditional Indian religious use of peyote) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
42 U.S.C. § 1996a.
Text
(a)Congressional findings and declarations
The Congress finds and declares that—
(1)for many Indian people, the traditional ceremonial use of the peyote cactus as a religious sacrament has for centuries been integral to a way of life, and significant in perpetuating Indian tribes and cultures;
(2)since 1965, this ceremonial use of peyote by Indians has been protected by Federal regulation;
(3)while at least 28 States have enacted laws which are similar to, or are in conformance with, the Federal regulation which protects the ceremonial use of peyote by Indian religious practitioners, 22 States have not done so, and this lack of uniformity has created hardship for Indian people who participate in such religious ceremonies;
(4)the Supreme Court of the United States, in the case of Emplo
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gonzales v. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União Do Vegetal
546 U.S. 418 (Supreme Court, 2006)
O Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao Do Vegetal v. Ashcroft
389 F.3d 973 (Tenth Circuit, 2004)
Oklevueha Native American Church of Hawaii, Inc. v. Holder
676 F.3d 829 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
Smith v. Fair Employment & Housing Commission
913 P.2d 909 (California Supreme Court, 1996)
P.F. Flores, Archbishop of San Antonio, and United States of America, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellant v. City of Boerne, Texas
73 F.3d 1352 (Fifth Circuit, 1996)
Ralph Harrison Benning v. William F. Amideo
391 F.3d 1299 (Eleventh Circuit, 2004)
In re Oi Brasil Holdings Coöperatief U.A.
578 B.R. 169 (S.D. New York, 2017)
Redhead v. Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists
440 F. Supp. 2d 211 (E.D. New York, 2006)
State v. Mooney
2004 UT 49 (Utah Supreme Court, 2004)
Keeler v. Mayor & City Council of Cumberland
928 F. Supp. 591 (D. Maryland, 1996)
Harold Runningbird v. Douglas Weber
198 F. App'x 576 (Eighth Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Lafley
656 F.3d 936 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
O Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao De Vegetal v. Ashcroft
314 F.3d 463 (Tenth Circuit, 2002)
O Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao Do Vegetal v. Ashcroft
282 F. Supp. 2d 1271 (D. New Mexico, 2002)
O Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao De Vegetal v. John Ashcroft
314 F.3d 463 (Tenth Circuit, 2002)
McBride v. Shawnee County, Kansas Court Services
71 F. Supp. 2d 1098 (D. Kansas, 1999)
O Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao Do Vegetal v. John Ashcroft
389 F.3d 973 (Tenth Circuit, 2004)
State v. McBride
955 P.2d 133 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 1998)
Mashkikii-Boodawaaning (Medicine Fireplace) Inc. v. Chippewa Valley Agency, Ltd.
(W.D. Wisconsin, 2024)
OKLEVUEHA NATIVE AMERICAN CHURCH v. Holder
676 F.3d 829 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 95–341, §3, as added Pub. L. 103–344, §2, Oct. 6, 1994, 108 Stat. 3125.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
The Religious Freedom Restoration Act, referred to in subsec. (b)(6), (7), probably means the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, Pub. L. 103–141, Nov. 16, 1993, 107 Stat. 1488, which is classified principally to chapter 21B (§2000bb et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2000bb of this title and Tables.
The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, referred to in subsec. (c)(2), is Pub. L. 92–203, Dec. 18, 1971, 85 Stat. 688, which is classified generally to chapter 33 (§1601 et seq.) of Title 43, Public Lands. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1601 of Title 43 and Tables.
References in Text
The Religious Freedom Restoration Act, referred to in subsec. (b)(6), (7), probably means the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, Pub. L. 103–141, Nov. 16, 1993, 107 Stat. 1488, which is classified principally to chapter 21B (§2000bb et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2000bb of this title and Tables.
The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, referred to in subsec. (c)(2), is Pub. L. 92–203, Dec. 18, 1971, 85 Stat. 688, which is classified generally to chapter 33 (§1601 et seq.) of Title 43, Public Lands. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1601 of Title 43 and Tables.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
42 U.S.C. § 1996a, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/42/1996a.