FEDERAL · 42 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER III—AVAILABLE COVERAGE CHOICES FOR ALL AMERICANS
Related definitions
42 U.S.C. § 18024
Title42 — The Public Health and Welfare
ChapterSUBCHAPTER III—AVAILABLE COVERAGE CHOICES FOR ALL AMERICANS
PartA
This text of 42 U.S.C. § 18024 (Related definitions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
42 U.S.C. § 18024.
Text
(a)Definitions relating to markets
In this title: 1
The term "group market" means the health insurance market under which individuals obtain health insurance coverage (directly or through any arrangement) on behalf of themselves (and their dependents) through a group health plan maintained by an employer.
The term "individual market" means the market for health insurance coverage offered to individuals other than in connection with a group health plan.
The terms "large group market" and "small group market" mean the health insurance market under which individuals obtain health insurance coverage (directly or through any arrangement) on behalf of themselves (and their dependents) through a group health plan maintained by a large employer (as defined in subsection (b)(1)) or by a small empl
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
King v. Burwell
135 S. Ct. 2480 (Supreme Court, 2015)
Johnson v. United States Office of Personnel Management
783 F.3d 655 (Seventh Circuit, 2015)
Andrea Schmitt v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan
965 F.3d 945 (Ninth Circuit, 2020)
New Mexico Health Connections v. HHS
946 F.3d 1138 (Tenth Circuit, 2019)
Geneva College v. Sebelius
929 F. Supp. 2d 402 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 2013)
Jacqueline Halbig v. Sylvia Mathews Burwell
758 F.3d 390 (D.C. Circuit, 2014)
United States House of Representatives v. Burwell
185 F. Supp. 3d 165 (District of Columbia, 2016)
Halbig v. Sebelius
27 F. Supp. 3d 1 (District of Columbia, 2014)
New York v. U.S. Dept. Of Labor
363 F. Supp. 3d 109 (D.C. Circuit, 2019)
Usoyan v. Republic of Turkey
(District of Columbia, 2025)
Oklahoma ex rel. Pruitt v. Burwell
51 F. Supp. 3d 1080 (E.D. Oklahoma, 2014)
State of New York v. United States Department of Labor
(District of Columbia, 2019)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 111–148, title I, §1304, title X, §10104(d), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 171, 900; Pub. L. 114–60, §2(a), Oct. 7, 2015, 129 Stat. 543.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
This title, referred to in subsecs. (a) to (d), is title I of Pub. L. 111–148, Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 130, which enacted this chapter and enacted, amended, and transferred numerous other sections and notes in the Code. For complete classification of title I to the Code, see Tables.
Amendments
2015—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 114–60, §2(a)(1), substituted "51" for "101".
Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 114–60, §2(a)(2), substituted "50" for "100".
Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 114–60, §2(a)(3), amended par. (3) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "In the case of plan years beginning before January 1, 2016, a State may elect to apply this subsection by substituting '51 employees' for '101 employees' in paragraph (1) and by substituting '50 employees' for '100 employees' in paragraph (2)."
2010—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 111–148, §10104(d), added subsec. (e).
References in Text
This title, referred to in subsecs. (a) to (d), is title I of Pub. L. 111–148, Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 130, which enacted this chapter and enacted, amended, and transferred numerous other sections and notes in the Code. For complete classification of title I to the Code, see Tables.
Amendments
2015—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 114–60, §2(a)(1), substituted "51" for "101".
Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 114–60, §2(a)(2), substituted "50" for "100".
Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 114–60, §2(a)(3), amended par. (3) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "In the case of plan years beginning before January 1, 2016, a State may elect to apply this subsection by substituting '51 employees' for '101 employees' in paragraph (1) and by substituting '50 employees' for '100 employees' in paragraph (2)."
2010—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 111–148, §10104(d), added subsec. (e).
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
42 U.S.C. § 18024, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/42/18024.