FEDERAL · 42 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER III—GENERAL PROVISIONS
Civil actions
42 U.S.C. § 11046
Title42 — The Public Health and Welfare
ChapterSUBCHAPTER III—GENERAL PROVISIONS
This text of 42 U.S.C. § 11046 (Civil actions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
42 U.S.C. § 11046.
Text
(a)Authority to bring civil actions
Except as provided in subsection (e), any person may commence a civil action on his own behalf against the following:
(A)An owner or operator of a facility for failure to do any of the following:
(B)The Administrator for failure to
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment
523 U.S. 83 (Supreme Court, 1998)
West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. Casey
499 U.S. 83 (Supreme Court, 1991)
Hallstrom v. Tillamook County
493 U.S. 20 (Supreme Court, 1990)
Prou v. United States
199 F.3d 37 (First Circuit, 1999)
Center for Biological Diversity, Inc. v. BP America Production Co.
704 F.3d 413 (Fifth Circuit, 2013)
Cox v. City of Dallas
256 F.3d 281 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)
United States Ex Rel. Grynberg v. Praxair, Inc.
389 F.3d 1038 (Tenth Circuit, 2004)
Citizens for a Better Environment v. The Steel Company, Also Known as Chicago Steel and Pickling Company
230 F.3d 923 (Seventh Circuit, 2000)
Litgo New Jersey Inc. v. Commissioner New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
725 F.3d 369 (Third Circuit, 2013)
United Phosphorus, Ltd. v. Angus Chemical Co.
322 F.3d 942 (Seventh Circuit, 2003)
United States v. Joseph Merlino
785 F.3d 79 (Third Circuit, 2015)
United States v. Charlie Lawuary
211 F.3d 372 (Seventh Circuit, 2000)
Pizzato v. Alabama Educational Television Commission
151 So. 3d 283 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2013)
Idaho Sporting Congress v. Computrol, Inc.
952 F. Supp. 690 (D. Idaho, 1996)
Delaware Valley Toxics Coalition v. Kurz-Hastings, Inc.
813 F. Supp. 1132 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1993)
Murphy v. Equifax Check Services, Inc.
35 F. Supp. 2d 200 (D. Connecticut, 1999)
Ex Rel. Gublo v. NovaCare, Inc.
62 F. Supp. 2d 347 (D. Massachusetts, 1999)
St. Bernard Citizens for Environmental Quality, Inc. v. Chalmette Refining, L.L.C.
354 F. Supp. 2d 697 (E.D. Louisiana, 2005)
Salmon v. Pacific Lumber Co.
30 F. Supp. 2d 1231 (N.D. California, 1998)
Atwell v. KW Plastics Recycling Division
173 F. Supp. 2d 1213 (M.D. Alabama, 2001)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 99–499, title III, §326, Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1755.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
This Act, referred to in subsec. (e), is Pub. L. 99–499, Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1613, known as the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1986 Amendment note set out under section 9601 of this title and Tables.
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, referred to in subsec. (f), are set out in the Appendix to Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
References in Text
This Act, referred to in subsec. (e), is Pub. L. 99–499, Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1613, known as the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1986 Amendment note set out under section 9601 of this title and Tables.
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, referred to in subsec. (f), are set out in the Appendix to Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
42 U.S.C. § 11046, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/42/11046.