FEDERAL · 40 U.S.C. · Chapter SUBCHAPTER II—ACQUIRING LAND
Federal jurisdiction
40 U.S.C. § 3112
Title40 — Public Buildings, Property, and Works
ChapterSUBCHAPTER II—ACQUIRING LAND
This text of 40 U.S.C. § 3112 (Federal jurisdiction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
40 U.S.C. § 3112.
Text
(a)Exclusive Jurisdiction Not Required.—It is not required that the Federal Government obtain exclusive jurisdiction in the United States over land or an interest in land it acquires.
(b)Acquisition and Acceptance of Jurisdiction.—When the head of a department, agency, or independent establishment of the Government, or other authorized officer of the department, agency, or independent establishment, considers it desirable, that individual may accept or secure, from the State in which land or an interest in land that is under the immediate jurisdiction, custody, or control of the individual is situated, consent to, or cession of, any jurisdiction over the land or interest not previously obtained. The individual shall indicate acceptance of jurisdiction on behalf of the Government by filin
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Fields
516 F.3d 923 (Tenth Circuit, 2008)
Club One Casino, Inc. v. David Bernhardt
959 F.3d 1142 (Ninth Circuit, 2020)
Parish of Plaquemines v. Total Petrochemical & Refining USA, Inc.
64 F. Supp. 3d 872 (E.D. Louisiana, 2014)
United States v. Victor Everette Silvers
129 F.4th 332 (Sixth Circuit, 2025)
United States v. Kahn
304 F. Supp. 2d 1353 (M.D. Florida, 2004)
Hill v. Kenyon Power Boats, Inc.
(M.D. Florida, 2023)
Childs v. San Diego Family Housing, LLC
(Ninth Circuit, 2025)
Humphrey, Roy v. United States
(S.D. Florida, 2025)
Wallace v. 3M Company <font color="red">DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.</font>
(D. Minnesota, 2020)
Scher v. 3M Company
(D. Minnesota, 2020)
John Doe v. Camp Pendleton & Quantico Housing, LLC
(S.D. California, 2020)
Wasylyna v. 3M Company <font color="red">DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.</font>
(D. Minnesota, 2020)
Amburgey v. 3M Company
(D. Minnesota, 2020)
Arndt v. 3M Company
(D. Minnesota, 2020)
Acosta v. 3M Company
(D. Minnesota, 2020)
Martin v. 3M Company <font color="red">DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.</font>
(D. Minnesota, 2020)
King v. Akima Global Services, LLC
(S.D. Florida, 2021)
Guillermo Beltran v. Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc.
(C.D. California, 2021)
United States v. Parker
36 F. Supp. 3d 550 (W.D. North Carolina, 2014)
Allen v. 3M Company
(D. Minnesota, 2021)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 107–217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1144.)
Editorial Notes
Subsection (a) is substituted for 40:255 (last par. 1st sentence words before semicolon) to eliminate unnecessary words.
In subsection (b), the words "exclusive or partial" are omitted as unnecessary.
In subsection (b), the words "exclusive or partial" are omitted as unnecessary.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
40 U.S.C. § 3112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/40/3112.