FEDERAL · 4 U.S.C. · Chapter 4
Same; exception of Indians
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
Nothing in sections 105 and 106 of this title shall be deemed to authorize the levy or collection of any tax on or from any Indian not otherwise taxed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
4 U.S.C. § 109 (Same; exception of Indians) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Warren Trading Post Co. v. Arizona Tax Commission
380 U.S. 685 (Supreme Court, 1965)
Bercier v. Kiga
127 Wash. App. 809 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2004)
CONFEDERATED SALISH & KOOTENAI TRIBES, MONT. v. Moe
392 F. Supp. 1297 (D. Montana, 1975)
Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. United States of America, State of New Mexico, Ex Rel. S. E. Reynolds, State Engineer, Amicus Curiae
601 F.2d 1116 (Tenth Circuit, 1979)
G. M. Shupe, Inc. v. Bureau of Revenue
550 P.2d 277 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1976)
Commissioner of Taxation v. Brun
174 N.W.2d 120 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1970)
Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community v. State of Arizona Paul Waddell, Director of the Arizona Department of Revenue
50 F.3d 734 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)
Southern Ute Indian Tribe v. Board of County Commissioners
855 F. Supp. 1194 (D. Colorado, 1994)
Baraga Products, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue
971 F. Supp. 294 (W.D. Michigan, 1997)
Mahoney v. State Tax Commission
524 P.2d 187 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1974)
Dillon v. State of Mont.
451 F. Supp. 168 (D. Montana, 1978)
Bryan v. Itasca County
228 N.W.2d 249 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1975)
Matheson v. Washington State Liquor Control Board
130 P.3d 897 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2006)
Valandra v. Viedt
259 N.W.2d 510 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1977)
Omaha Tribe of Indians v. Peters
382 F. Supp. 421 (D. Nebraska, 1974)
Matheson v. STATE LIQUOR CONTROL BD.
130 P.3d 897 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2006)
Source Credit
History
(July 30, 1947, ch. 389, 61 Stat. 645.)