FEDERAL · 39 U.S.C. · Chapter 12
Recognition of labor organizations
39 U.S.C. § 1203
Title39 — Postal Service
Chapter12 — EMPLOYEE-MANAGEMENT AGREEMENTS
This text of 39 U.S.C. § 1203 (Recognition of labor organizations) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
39 U.S.C. § 1203.
Text
(a)The Postal Service shall accord exclusive recognition to a labor organization when the organization has been selected by a majority of the employees in an appropriate unit as their representative.
(b)Agreements and supplements in effect on the date of enactment of this section covering employees in the former Post Office Department shall continue to be recognized by the Postal Service until altered or amended pursuant to law.
(c)When a petition has been filed, in accordance with such regulations as may be prescribed by the National Labor Relations Board—
(1)by an employee, a group of employees, or any labor organization acting in their behalf, alleging that (A) a substantial number of employees wish to be represented for collective bargaining by a labor organization and that the Pos
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Janus v. State, County, and Municipal Employees
585 U.S. 878 (Supreme Court, 2018)
National Association of Letter Carriers, Afl-Cio v. Sombrotto
449 F.2d 915 (Second Circuit, 1971)
Darrell D. McNair v. United States Postal Service
768 F.2d 730 (Fifth Circuit, 1985)
National Ass'n of Letter Carriers v. Sombrotto
449 F.2d 915 (Second Circuit, 1971)
Winston v. United States Postal Service
585 F.2d 198 (Seventh Circuit, 1978)
Malone v. United States Postal Service
526 F.2d 1099 (Sixth Circuit, 1975)
National Post Office Mail Handlers, Watchmen, Messengers & Group Leaders Division of the Laborers' International Union v. Johnson (In Re Johnson)
139 B.R. 163 (E.D. Virginia, 1992)
Whisman v. Robbins
55 F.3d 1140 (Sixth Circuit, 1995)
Acosta v. Potter
410 F. Supp. 2d 298 (S.D. New York, 2006)
Withers v. United States Postal Service
417 F. Supp. 1 (W.D. Missouri, 1976)
Weber v. Potter
338 F. Supp. 2d 600 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2004)
Sisley v. Leyendecker
260 F.3d 849 (Eighth Circuit, 2001)
National Alliance of Postal & Federal Employees v. Klassen
369 F. Supp. 747 (District of Columbia, 1974)
Teamsters Local Union No. 2000 v. Hoffa
284 F. Supp. 2d 684 (E.D. Michigan, 2003)
Jones v. American Postal Workers Union, National
192 F.3d 417 (Fourth Circuit, 1999)
Willis Sisley v. Rick Leyendecker
260 F.3d 849 (Eighth Circuit, 2001)
Parker v. National Association of Letter Carriers
(E.D. Michigan, 2020)
Walter Winston v. United States Postal Service
585 F.2d 198 (Seventh Circuit, 1978)
American Postal Workers Union, Afl-Cio v. United States Postal Service
(District of Columbia, 2025)
Maryland Attorney General Opinion 98 OAG 114
(Maryland Attorney General Reports, 2013)
Source Credit
History
(Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 734.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
The date of enactment of this section, referred to in subsec. (b), means the date of enactment of Pub. L. 91–375, which was approved Aug. 12, 1970.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.
References in Text
The date of enactment of this section, referred to in subsec. (b), means the date of enactment of Pub. L. 91–375, which was approved Aug. 12, 1970.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
39 U.S.C. § 1203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/39/1203.