FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 30
Request for reexamination
35 U.S.C. § 302
Title35 — Patents
Chapter30 — PRIOR ART CITATIONS TO OFFICE AND EX PARTE REEXAMINATION OF PATENTS
This text of 35 U.S.C. § 302 (Request for reexamination) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
35 U.S.C. § 302.
Text
Any person at any time may file a request for reexamination by the Office of any claim of a patent on the basis of any prior art cited under the provisions of section 301. The request must be in writing and must be accompanied by payment of a reexamination fee established by the Director pursuant to the provisions of section 41. The request must set forth the pertinency and manner of applying cited prior art to every claim for which reexamination is requested. Unless the requesting person is the owner of the patent, the Director promptly will send a copy of the request to the owner of record of the patent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. Lee
579 U.S. 261 (Supreme Court, 2016)
Aylus Networks, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
856 F.3d 1353 (Federal Circuit, 2017)
In Re Swanson
540 F.3d 1368 (Federal Circuit, 2008)
In re Lonardo
119 F.3d 960 (Federal Circuit, 1997)
Syntex (u.s.a.) Inc. v. U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
882 F.2d 1570 (Federal Circuit, 1989)
The Boeing Company v. Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, and Cegedur Societe De Transformation De L'ALuminum Pechiney
853 F.2d 878 (Federal Circuit, 1988)
United Sweetener USA, Inc. v. Nutrasweet Co.
766 F. Supp. 212 (D. Delaware, 1991)
Total Containment, Inc. v. Environ Products, Inc.
921 F. Supp. 1355 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1995)
Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
896 F.3d 1322 (Federal Circuit, 2018)
Freeman v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
661 F. Supp. 886 (D. Delaware, 1987)
Uniloc 2017 LLC v. Hulu, LLC
966 F.3d 1295 (Federal Circuit, 2020)
Tomco2 Equipment Co. v. Southeastern Agri-Systems, Inc.
542 F. Supp. 2d 1303 (N.D. Georgia, 2008)
In Re Laughlin Products, Inc.
265 F. Supp. 2d 525 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2003)
Akzenta Paneele + Profile GmbH v. Unilin Flooring N.C. LLC
464 F. Supp. 2d 481 (D. Maryland, 2006)
In Re Paul Opprecht on Motion for Reconsideration
868 F.2d 1264 (Federal Circuit, 1989)
In Re Continental General Tire, Inc.
81 F.3d 1089 (Federal Circuit, 1996)
Heinl v. Godici
143 F. Supp. 2d 593 (E.D. Virginia, 2001)
Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly & Co.
529 F. Supp. 2d 106 (D. Massachusetts, 2007)
Dresser Industries, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.
530 F. Supp. 303 (N.D. Texas, 1981)
Imi-Tech Corp. v. Gagliani
691 F. Supp. 214 (S.D. California, 1987)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 96–517, §1, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 3015; amended Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(a)(8), (10)(A)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–582; Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, §13206(b)(1)(B), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1906; Pub. L. 112–29, §20(j), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 335.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2011—Pub. L. 112–29 struck out "of this title" after "301" and after "41".
2002—Pub. L. 107–273 made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106–113, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(a)(10)(A)]. See 1999 Amendment note below.
1999—Pub. L. 106–113, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(a)(10)(A)], as amended by Pub. L. 107–273, substituted "Director promptly" for "Commissioner promptly".
Pub. L. 106–113, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(a)(8)], substituted "Director pursuant" for "Commissioner of Patents pursuant".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2011 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after that effective date, see section 20(l) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 2 of this title.
Effective Date of 1999 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.
Effective Date
Section effective July 1, 1981, and applicable to patents in force as of July 1, 1981, or issued thereafter, see section 8(b) of Pub. L. 96–517, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 41 of this title.
Amendments
2011—Pub. L. 112–29 struck out "of this title" after "301" and after "41".
2002—Pub. L. 107–273 made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106–113, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(a)(10)(A)]. See 1999 Amendment note below.
1999—Pub. L. 106–113, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(a)(10)(A)], as amended by Pub. L. 107–273, substituted "Director promptly" for "Commissioner promptly".
Pub. L. 106–113, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(a)(8)], substituted "Director pursuant" for "Commissioner of Patents pursuant".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2011 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after that effective date, see section 20(l) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 2 of this title.
Effective Date of 1999 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.
Effective Date
Section effective July 1, 1981, and applicable to patents in force as of July 1, 1981, or issued thereafter, see section 8(b) of Pub. L. 96–517, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 41 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
35 U.S.C. § 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/35/302.