FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 29

Advice of counsel

35 U.S.C. § 298
Title35Patents
Chapter29 — REMEDIES FOR INFRINGEMENT OF PATENT, AND OTHER ACTIONS

This text of 35 U.S.C. § 298 (Advice of counsel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
35 U.S.C. § 298.

Text

The failure of an infringer to obtain the advice of counsel with respect to any allegedly infringed patent, or the failure of the infringer to present such advice to the court or jury, may not be used to prove that the accused infringer willfully infringed the patent or that the infringer intended to induce infringement of the patent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.
579 U.S. 93 (Supreme Court, 2016)
455 case citations
Sri Int'l, Inc. v. Cisco Sys., Inc.
930 F.3d 1295 (Federal Circuit, 2019)
102 case citations
Carson Optical Inc. v. eBay Inc.
202 F. Supp. 3d 247 (E.D. New York, 2016)
27 case citations
Milwaukee Elec. Tool Corp. v. Snap-On Inc.
288 F. Supp. 3d 872 (E.D. Wisconsin, 2017)
11 case citations
Asia Vital Components Co., Ltd. v. Asetek Danmark A/S
377 F. Supp. 3d 990 (N.D. California, 2019)
11 case citations
Sonos, Inc. v. D&M Holdings Inc.
297 F. Supp. 3d 501 (D. Delaware, 2017)
8 case citations
Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.
780 F.3d 1357 (Federal Circuit, 2015)
6 case citations
Sri International, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
918 F.3d 1368 (Federal Circuit, 2019)
6 case citations
Ultratec, Inc. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc.
45 F. Supp. 3d 881 (W.D. Wisconsin, 2014)
2 case citations
Provisur Technologies, Inc. v. Weber, Inc.
119 F.4th 948 (Federal Circuit, 2024)
2 case citations
Suprema, Inc. v. International Trade Commission
626 F. App'x 273 (Federal Circuit, 2015)
2 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 112–29, §17(a), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 329.)

Editorial Notes

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date
Pub. L. 112–274, §1(a), Jan. 14, 2013, 126 Stat. 2456, provided that: "Notwithstanding section 35 of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act [Pub. L. 112–29] (35 U.S.C. 1 note), section 298 of title 35, United States Code, shall apply to any civil action commenced on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Jan. 14, 2013]."
Except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 112–29, section effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to any patent issued on or after that effective date, see section 35 of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as an Effective Date of 2011 Amendment note under section 1 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 U.S.C. § 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/35/298.