FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 29
Presumption: Product made by patented process
35 U.S.C. § 295
Title35 — Patents
Chapter29 — REMEDIES FOR INFRINGEMENT OF PATENT, AND OTHER ACTIONS
This text of 35 U.S.C. § 295 (Presumption: Product made by patented process) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
35 U.S.C. § 295.
Text
In actions alleging infringement of a process patent based on the importation, sale, offer for sale, or use of a product which is made from a process patented in the United States, if the court finds—
(1)that a substantial likelihood exists that the product was made by the patented process, and
(2)that the plaintiff has made a reasonable effort to determine the process actually used in the production of the product and was unable to so determine,
the product shall be presumed to have been so made, and the burden of establishing that the product was not made by the process shall be on the party asserting that it was not so made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Novo Nordisk of North America, Inc., Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Novo Nordisk, A/s v. Genentech, Inc.
77 F.3d 1364 (Federal Circuit, 1996)
Kemin Foods, L.C. v. Pigmentos Vegetales Del Centro S.A. De C.V.
464 F.3d 1339 (Federal Circuit, 2006)
Creative Compounds, LLC v. Starmark Laboratories
651 F.3d 1303 (Federal Circuit, 2011)
Bayer Ag and Bayer Corporation v. Housey Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
340 F.3d 1367 (Federal Circuit, 2003)
Nutrinova Nutrition Specialties and Food Ingredients GmbH v. International Trade Com'n
224 F.3d 1356 (Federal Circuit, 2000)
Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.
794 F.3d 1347 (Federal Circuit, 2015)
Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.
411 F. Supp. 2d 490 (D. New Jersey, 2006)
CVI/Beta Ventures, Inc. v. TURA LP
905 F. Supp. 1171 (E.D. New York, 1995)
Pfizer Inc. v. F & S Alloys & Minerals Corp.
856 F. Supp. 808 (S.D. New York, 1994)
Kemin Foods, L.C. v. Pigmentos Vegetales Del Centro S.A. De C.V.
240 F. Supp. 2d 963 (S.D. Iowa, 2003)
McDAVID KNEE GUARD, INC. v. NIKE USA, INC.
683 F. Supp. 2d 740 (N.D. Illinois, 2010)
Lg Display Co., Ltd. v. Au Optronics Corporation
709 F. Supp. 2d 311 (D. Delaware, 2010)
LG Display Co. v. AU Optronics Corp.
265 F.R.D. 199 (D. Delaware, 2010)
Genentech, Inc. v. Boehringer Mannheim GmbH
47 F. Supp. 2d 91 (D. Massachusetts, 1999)
Kemin Foods, L.C. v. Pigmentos Vegetales Del Centro S.A.
357 F. Supp. 2d 1105 (S.D. Iowa, 2005)
Dow Chemical Co. v. Mee Industries
264 F. Supp. 2d 1018 (M.D. Florida, 2002)
Nutrinova Nutrition Specialties & Food Ingredients GmbH v. International Trade Commission
224 F.3d 1356 (Federal Circuit, 2000)
Caputo v. Sealed Air Corp. (US)
60 F. App'x 822 (Federal Circuit, 2003)
United Therapeutics Corporation v. Liquidia Technologies, Inc.
(D. Delaware, 2022)
Dasso International, Inc. v. MOSO North America, Inc.
(D. Delaware, 2025)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 100–418, title IX, §9005(a), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1566; amended Pub. L. 103–465, title V, §533(b)(7), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4990.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1994—Pub. L. 103–465 substituted "sale, offer for sale, or use" for "sale, or use" in introductory provisions.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1994 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 103–465 effective on date that is one year after date on which the WTO Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States [Jan. 1, 1995], with provisions relating to earliest filed patent application, see section 534(a), (b)(3) of Pub. L. 103–465, set out as a note under section 154 of this title.
Effective Date
Section effective 6 months after Aug. 23, 1988, and, subject to enumerated exceptions, applicable only with respect to products made or imported after such effective date, see section 9006 of Pub. L. 100–418, set out as an Effective Date of 1988 Amendment note under section 271 of this title.
Amendments
1994—Pub. L. 103–465 substituted "sale, offer for sale, or use" for "sale, or use" in introductory provisions.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1994 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 103–465 effective on date that is one year after date on which the WTO Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States [Jan. 1, 1995], with provisions relating to earliest filed patent application, see section 534(a), (b)(3) of Pub. L. 103–465, set out as a note under section 154 of this title.
Effective Date
Section effective 6 months after Aug. 23, 1988, and, subject to enumerated exceptions, applicable only with respect to products made or imported after such effective date, see section 9006 of Pub. L. 100–418, set out as an Effective Date of 1988 Amendment note under section 271 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
35 U.S.C. § 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/35/295.