FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 29

Presumption: Product made by patented process

35 U.S.C. § 295
Title35Patents
Chapter29 — REMEDIES FOR INFRINGEMENT OF PATENT, AND OTHER ACTIONS

This text of 35 U.S.C. § 295 (Presumption: Product made by patented process) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
35 U.S.C. § 295.

Text

In actions alleging infringement of a process patent based on the importation, sale, offer for sale, or use of a product which is made from a process patented in the United States, if the court finds—

(1)that a substantial likelihood exists that the product was made by the patented process, and
(2)that the plaintiff has made a reasonable effort to determine the process actually used in the production of the product and was unable to so determine, the product shall be presumed to have been so made, and the burden of establishing that the product was not made by the process shall be on the party asserting that it was not so made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kemin Foods, L.C. v. Pigmentos Vegetales Del Centro S.A. De C.V.
464 F.3d 1339 (Federal Circuit, 2006)
84 case citations
Creative Compounds, LLC v. Starmark Laboratories
651 F.3d 1303 (Federal Circuit, 2011)
54 case citations
Bayer Ag and Bayer Corporation v. Housey Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
340 F.3d 1367 (Federal Circuit, 2003)
40 case citations
Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.
794 F.3d 1347 (Federal Circuit, 2015)
9 case citations
Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.
411 F. Supp. 2d 490 (D. New Jersey, 2006)
6 case citations
CVI/Beta Ventures, Inc. v. TURA LP
905 F. Supp. 1171 (E.D. New York, 1995)
6 case citations
Pfizer Inc. v. F & S Alloys & Minerals Corp.
856 F. Supp. 808 (S.D. New York, 1994)
4 case citations
Kemin Foods, L.C. v. Pigmentos Vegetales Del Centro S.A. De C.V.
240 F. Supp. 2d 963 (S.D. Iowa, 2003)
3 case citations
McDAVID KNEE GUARD, INC. v. NIKE USA, INC.
683 F. Supp. 2d 740 (N.D. Illinois, 2010)
3 case citations
Lg Display Co., Ltd. v. Au Optronics Corporation
709 F. Supp. 2d 311 (D. Delaware, 2010)
2 case citations
LG Display Co. v. AU Optronics Corp.
265 F.R.D. 199 (D. Delaware, 2010)
2 case citations
Genentech, Inc. v. Boehringer Mannheim GmbH
47 F. Supp. 2d 91 (D. Massachusetts, 1999)
1 case citations
Kemin Foods, L.C. v. Pigmentos Vegetales Del Centro S.A.
357 F. Supp. 2d 1105 (S.D. Iowa, 2005)
1 case citations
Dow Chemical Co. v. Mee Industries
264 F. Supp. 2d 1018 (M.D. Florida, 2002)
1 case citations
Caputo v. Sealed Air Corp. (US)
60 F. App'x 822 (Federal Circuit, 2003)
1 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 100–418, title IX, §9005(a), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1566; amended Pub. L. 103–465, title V, §533(b)(7), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4990.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1994—Pub. L. 103–465 substituted "sale, offer for sale, or use" for "sale, or use" in introductory provisions.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1994 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 103–465 effective on date that is one year after date on which the WTO Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States [Jan. 1, 1995], with provisions relating to earliest filed patent application, see section 534(a), (b)(3) of Pub. L. 103–465, set out as a note under section 154 of this title.

Effective Date
Section effective 6 months after Aug. 23, 1988, and, subject to enumerated exceptions, applicable only with respect to products made or imported after such effective date, see section 9006 of Pub. L. 100–418, set out as an Effective Date of 1988 Amendment note under section 271 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 U.S.C. § 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/35/295.