FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 29
Voluntary arbitration
35 U.S.C. § 294
Title35 — Patents
Chapter29 — REMEDIES FOR INFRINGEMENT OF PATENT, AND OTHER ACTIONS
This text of 35 U.S.C. § 294 (Voluntary arbitration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
35 U.S.C. § 294.
Text
(a)A contract involving a patent or any right under a patent may contain a provision requiring arbitration of any dispute relating to patent validity or infringement arising under the contract. In the absence of such a provision, the parties to an existing patent validity or infringement dispute may agree in writing to settle such dispute by arbitration. Any such provision or agreement shall be valid, irrevocable, and enforceable, except for any grounds that exist at law or in equity for revocation of a contract.
(b)Arbitration of such disputes, awards by arbitrators and confirmation of awards shall be governed by title 9, to the extent such title is not inconsistent with this section. In any such arbitration proceeding, the defenses provided for under section 282 shall be considered by
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Deprenyl Animal Health, Inc. v. The University of Toronto Innovations Foundation
297 F.3d 1343 (Federal Circuit, 2002)
The Saturday Evening Post Company and the Curtis Publishing Company v. Rumbleseat Press, Inc.
816 F.2d 1191 (Seventh Circuit, 1987)
Flex-Foot, Inc. And Van L. Phillips v. Crp, Inc. (Doing Business as Springlite)
238 F.3d 1362 (Federal Circuit, 2001)
Concat Lp v. Unilever, Plc
350 F. Supp. 2d 796 (N.D. California, 2004)
Microchip Technology Incorporated v. U.S. Philips Corporation and Philips Electronics North America Corporation
367 F.3d 1350 (Federal Circuit, 2004)
Ballard Medical Products v. H. Earl Wright, Defendant/cross-Appellant
823 F.2d 527 (Federal Circuit, 1987)
National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Consolidated Rail Corporation
892 F.2d 1066 (D.C. Circuit, 1990)
Saint-Gobain Autover USA, Inc. v. Xinyi Glass North America, Inc.
707 F. Supp. 2d 737 (N.D. Ohio, 2010)
Bryan W. Nickerson, Jr. v. Josef Kutschera, A. G. Birkenruth, the Tidewater Oil Company
390 F.2d 812 (Third Circuit, 1968)
Rhone-Poulenc Specialites Chimiques, and Rhone-Poulenc Inc., Plaintiffs v. Scm Corporation
769 F.2d 1569 (Federal Circuit, 1985)
Invista North America S.À.R.L. v. Rhodia Polyamide Intermediates S.A.S.
503 F. Supp. 2d 195 (District of Columbia, 2007)
Affymax, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson
420 F. Supp. 2d 876 (N.D. Illinois, 2006)
Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc. v. Guidant Corp.
143 F.3d 428 (Eighth Circuit, 1998)
Bayer Cropscience Ag v. Dow Agrosciences LLC
680 F. App'x 985 (Federal Circuit, 2017)
Warner & Swasey Co. v. Salvagnini Transferica S.P.A.
633 F. Supp. 1209 (W.D. New York, 1986)
Cobra North America, LLC v. Cold Cut Systems Svenska AB
639 F. Supp. 2d 1217 (D. Colorado, 2008)
Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.
149 F. Supp. 2d 610 (S.D. Indiana, 2001)
Max Planck Gesellschaft Zur Foederung Der Wissenschaften, E v. v. General Electric Co.
858 F. Supp. 380 (S.D. New York, 1994)
Pom Wonderful LLC v. Federal Trade Commission
894 F. Supp. 2d 40 (District of Columbia, 2012)
General Mills, Inc. v. Hunt-Wesson, Inc.
889 F. Supp. 1119 (D. Minnesota, 1995)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 97–247, §17(b)(1), Aug. 27, 1982, 96 Stat. 322; amended Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(a)(10)(A)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–582; Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, §13206(a)(19), (b)(1)(B), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1905, 1906; Pub. L. 112–29, §20(j), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 335.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2011—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 112–29 struck out "of this title" after "282".
2002—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 107–273, §13206(a)(19)(A), struck out "United States Code," after "title 9,".
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 107–273, §13206(a)(19)(B), substituted "rendered by a court of" for "rendered by a court to".
Subsecs. (d), (e). Pub. L. 107–273, §13206(b)(1)(B), made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106–113. See 1999 Amendment note below.
1999—Subsecs. (d), (e). Pub. L. 106–113, as amended by Pub. L. 107–273, §13206(b)(1)(B), substituted "Director" for "Commissioner" wherever appearing.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2011 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after that effective date, see section 20(l) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 2 of this title.
Effective Date of 1999 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.
Effective Date
Pub. L. 97–247, §17(c), Aug. 27, 1982, 96 Stat. 323, provided that: "Sections 5, 6, 8 through 12, and 17(b) of this Act [enacting this section and amending sections 21, 111, 116, and 256 of this title and sections 1058, 1063, 1064, 1065, and 1066 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade] shall take effect six months after enactment [Aug. 27, 1982]."
Amendments
2011—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 112–29 struck out "of this title" after "282".
2002—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 107–273, §13206(a)(19)(A), struck out "United States Code," after "title 9,".
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 107–273, §13206(a)(19)(B), substituted "rendered by a court of" for "rendered by a court to".
Subsecs. (d), (e). Pub. L. 107–273, §13206(b)(1)(B), made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106–113. See 1999 Amendment note below.
1999—Subsecs. (d), (e). Pub. L. 106–113, as amended by Pub. L. 107–273, §13206(b)(1)(B), substituted "Director" for "Commissioner" wherever appearing.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2011 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after that effective date, see section 20(l) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 2 of this title.
Effective Date of 1999 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.
Effective Date
Pub. L. 97–247, §17(c), Aug. 27, 1982, 96 Stat. 323, provided that: "Sections 5, 6, 8 through 12, and 17(b) of this Act [enacting this section and amending sections 21, 111, 116, and 256 of this title and sections 1058, 1063, 1064, 1065, and 1066 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade] shall take effect six months after enactment [Aug. 27, 1982]."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
35 U.S.C. § 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/35/294.