FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 29

Voluntary arbitration

35 U.S.C. § 294
Title35Patents
Chapter29 — REMEDIES FOR INFRINGEMENT OF PATENT, AND OTHER ACTIONS

This text of 35 U.S.C. § 294 (Voluntary arbitration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
35 U.S.C. § 294.

Text

(a)A contract involving a patent or any right under a patent may contain a provision requiring arbitration of any dispute relating to patent validity or infringement arising under the contract. In the absence of such a provision, the parties to an existing patent validity or infringement dispute may agree in writing to settle such dispute by arbitration. Any such provision or agreement shall be valid, irrevocable, and enforceable, except for any grounds that exist at law or in equity for revocation of a contract.
(b)Arbitration of such disputes, awards by arbitrators and confirmation of awards shall be governed by title 9, to the extent such title is not inconsistent with this section. In any such arbitration proceeding, the defenses provided for under section 282 shall be considered by

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Deprenyl Animal Health, Inc. v. The University of Toronto Innovations Foundation
297 F.3d 1343 (Federal Circuit, 2002)
120 case citations
Flex-Foot, Inc. And Van L. Phillips v. Crp, Inc. (Doing Business as Springlite)
238 F.3d 1362 (Federal Circuit, 2001)
91 case citations
Concat Lp v. Unilever, Plc
350 F. Supp. 2d 796 (N.D. California, 2004)
78 case citations
Ballard Medical Products v. H. Earl Wright, Defendant/cross-Appellant
823 F.2d 527 (Federal Circuit, 1987)
32 case citations
National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Consolidated Rail Corporation
892 F.2d 1066 (D.C. Circuit, 1990)
27 case citations
Saint-Gobain Autover USA, Inc. v. Xinyi Glass North America, Inc.
707 F. Supp. 2d 737 (N.D. Ohio, 2010)
12 case citations
Invista North America S.À.R.L. v. Rhodia Polyamide Intermediates S.A.S.
503 F. Supp. 2d 195 (District of Columbia, 2007)
10 case citations
Affymax, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson
420 F. Supp. 2d 876 (N.D. Illinois, 2006)
9 case citations
Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc. v. Guidant Corp.
143 F.3d 428 (Eighth Circuit, 1998)
7 case citations
Bayer Cropscience Ag v. Dow Agrosciences LLC
680 F. App'x 985 (Federal Circuit, 2017)
6 case citations
Warner & Swasey Co. v. Salvagnini Transferica S.P.A.
633 F. Supp. 1209 (W.D. New York, 1986)
6 case citations
Cobra North America, LLC v. Cold Cut Systems Svenska AB
639 F. Supp. 2d 1217 (D. Colorado, 2008)
5 case citations
Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.
149 F. Supp. 2d 610 (S.D. Indiana, 2001)
5 case citations
Pom Wonderful LLC v. Federal Trade Commission
894 F. Supp. 2d 40 (District of Columbia, 2012)
5 case citations
General Mills, Inc. v. Hunt-Wesson, Inc.
889 F. Supp. 1119 (D. Minnesota, 1995)
3 case citations

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 97–247, §17(b)(1), Aug. 27, 1982, 96 Stat. 322; amended Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(a)(10)(A)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–582; Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, §13206(a)(19), (b)(1)(B), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1905, 1906; Pub. L. 112–29, §20(j), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 335.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2011—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 112–29 struck out "of this title" after "282".
2002—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 107–273, §13206(a)(19)(A), struck out "United States Code," after "title 9,".
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 107–273, §13206(a)(19)(B), substituted "rendered by a court of" for "rendered by a court to".
Subsecs. (d), (e). Pub. L. 107–273, §13206(b)(1)(B), made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106–113. See 1999 Amendment note below.
1999—Subsecs. (d), (e). Pub. L. 106–113, as amended by Pub. L. 107–273, §13206(b)(1)(B), substituted "Director" for "Commissioner" wherever appearing.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2011 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after that effective date, see section 20(l) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 2 of this title.

Effective Date of 1999 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.

Effective Date
Pub. L. 97–247, §17(c), Aug. 27, 1982, 96 Stat. 323, provided that: "Sections 5, 6, 8 through 12, and 17(b) of this Act [enacting this section and amending sections 21, 111, 116, and 256 of this title and sections 1058, 1063, 1064, 1065, and 1066 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade] shall take effect six months after enactment [Aug. 27, 1982]."

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 U.S.C. § 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/35/294.