FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 29

Notice of patent suits

35 U.S.C. § 290
Title35Patents
Chapter29 — REMEDIES FOR INFRINGEMENT OF PATENT, AND OTHER ACTIONS

This text of 35 U.S.C. § 290 (Notice of patent suits) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
35 U.S.C. § 290.

Text

The clerks of the courts of the United States, within one month after the filing of an action under this title shall give notice thereof in writing to the Director, setting forth so far as known the names and addresses of the parties, name of the inventor, and the designating number of the patent upon which the action has been brought. If any other patent is subsequently included in the action he shall give like notice thereof. Within one month after the decision is rendered or a judgment issued the clerk of the court shall give notice thereof to the Director. The Director shall, on receipt of such notices, enter the same in the file of such patent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Amgen, Inc. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc.
126 F. Supp. 2d 69 (D. Massachusetts, 2001)
27 case citations
Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc. v. Schering-Plough Corp.
106 F. Supp. 2d 696 (D. New Jersey, 2000)
10 case citations
Pequignot v. Solo Cup Co.
640 F. Supp. 2d 714 (E.D. Virginia, 2009)
6 case citations
Unique Product Solutions, Ltd. v. HY-Grade Valve, Inc.
765 F. Supp. 2d 997 (N.D. Ohio, 2011)
6 case citations
Biogen Idec MA Inc. v. TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY CITY OF NEW YORK
332 F. Supp. 2d 286 (D. Massachusetts, 2004)
5 case citations
Luka v. Procter and Gamble Co.
785 F. Supp. 2d 712 (N.D. Illinois, 2011)
4 case citations
Kothmann Enterprises, Inc. v. Trinity Industries, Inc.
455 F. Supp. 2d 608 (S.D. Texas, 2006)
4 case citations
Rogers v. TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC.
793 F. Supp. 2d 711 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2011)
3 case citations
San Francisco Technology, Inc. v. Graphic Packaging International, Inc.
798 F. Supp. 2d 1333 (N.D. Georgia, 2011)
3 case citations
Haney v. Timesavers, Inc.
900 F. Supp. 1378 (D. Oregon, 1995)
3 case citations
In Re Convertible Rowing Exerciser Patent Litigation
721 F. Supp. 596 (D. Delaware, 1989)
3 case citations
Kirkwood Florist, Inc. v. Hi-Float, Inc.
812 F. Supp. 2d 1000 (E.D. Missouri, 2011)
1 case citations
Hollander v. RANBAXY LABORATORIES INC.
804 F. Supp. 2d 344 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2011)
1 case citations
Nisus Corp. v. Perma-Chink Systems, Inc.
421 F. Supp. 2d 1084 (E.D. Tennessee, 2006)
1 case citations

Source Credit

History

(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 814; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(a)(10)(A)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–582; Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, §13206(b)(1)(B), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1906.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §70, part (R.S. 4921, amended (1) Mar. 3, 1897, ch. 391, §6, 29 Stat. 694, (2) Feb. 18, 1922, ch. 58, §8, 42 Stat. 392, (3) Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 726, §1, 60 Stat. 778).
This is the last sentence of R.S. 4921, third paragraph, with minor changes in language.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2002—Pub. L. 107–273 made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106–113. See 1999 Amendment note below.
1999—Pub. L. 106–113, as amended by Pub. L. 107–273, substituted "Director" for "Commissioner" wherever appearing.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1999 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 U.S.C. § 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/35/290.