FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 29
Action for infringement of a patent containing an invalid claim
Current through Pub. L. 119-102
Whenever a claim of a patent is invalid, an action may be maintained for the infringement of a claim of the patent which may be valid. The patentee shall recover no costs unless a disclaimer of the invalid claim has been entered at the Patent and Trademark Office before the commencement of the suit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
35 U.S.C. § 288 (Action for infringement of a patent containing an invalid claim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois Foundation
402 U.S. 313 (Supreme Court, 1971)
Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.
649 F.3d 1276 (Federal Circuit, 2011)
Shatterproof Glass Corporation, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Libbey-Owens Ford Company and Leybold-Heraeus Gmbh, Appellants/cross-Appellees
758 F.2d 613 (Federal Circuit, 1985)
Bio-Technology General Corp. And Bio-Technology General (Israel), Ltd. v. Genentech, Inc.
80 F.3d 1553 (Federal Circuit, 1996)
Kearney & Trecker Corporation v. Giddings & Lewis, Inc.
452 F.2d 579 (Seventh Circuit, 1972)
Kearney & Trecker Corp. v. Cincinnati Milacron Inc.
562 F.2d 365 (Sixth Circuit, 1977)
Sun Microsystems, Inc. v. Versata Enterprises, Inc.
630 F. Supp. 2d 395 (D. Delaware, 2009)
Chromalloy American Corp. v. Alloy Surfaces Co., Inc.
339 F. Supp. 859 (D. Delaware, 1972)
Woodstream Corporation v. Herter's, Inc. And George L. Herter
446 F.2d 1143 (Eighth Circuit, 1971)
Edward A. Zegers, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Zegers, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
458 F.2d 726 (Seventh Circuit, 1972)
Dennison Manufacturing Co. v. Ben Clements & Sons, Inc.
467 F. Supp. 391 (S.D. New York, 1979)
Bishman Manufacturing Co. And George T. Hemmeter v. Stewart-Warner Corporation
380 F.2d 336 (Seventh Circuit, 1967)
CPC International, Inc. v. Standard Brands Inc.
385 F. Supp. 1057 (D. Delaware, 1974)
Procter & Gamble Co. v. Nabisco Brands, Inc.
711 F. Supp. 759 (D. Delaware, 1989)
Karl Zysset and New-Nel Kitchen Products Company, and Cross v. Popeil Brothers, Inc., and Cross Karl Zysset v. Popeil Brothers, Inc.
318 F.2d 701 (Seventh Circuit, 1963)
Kearney & Trecker Corp. v. Cincinnati Milacron, Inc.
403 F. Supp. 1040 (S.D. Ohio, 1975)
Cordance Corp. v. Amazon. Com, Inc.
631 F. Supp. 2d 484 (D. Delaware, 2009)
National Business Systems, Inc. v. AM International, Inc.
546 F. Supp. 340 (N.D. Illinois, 1982)
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. v. General Electric Co.
720 F. Supp. 2d 1061 (W.D. Arkansas, 2010)
Leach v. Rockwood & Company
273 F. Supp. 779 (W.D. Wisconsin, 1967)
Source Credit
History
(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 813; Pub. L. 93–596, §1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1949; Pub. L. 112–29, §20(h), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 334.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §71 (R.S. 4922).
The necessity for a disclaimer to recover on valid claims is eliminated. See section 253.
Language is changed.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2011—Pub. L. 112–29 struck out ", without deceptive intention," after "Whenever".
1975—Pub. L. 93–596 substituted "Patent and Trademark Office" for "Patent Office".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2011 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after that effective date, see section 20(l) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 2 of this title.
Effective Date of 1975 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 93–596 effective Jan. 2, 1975, see section 4 of Pub. L. 93–596, set out as a note under section 1111 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §71 (R.S. 4922).
The necessity for a disclaimer to recover on valid claims is eliminated. See section 253.
Language is changed.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2011—Pub. L. 112–29 struck out ", without deceptive intention," after "Whenever".
1975—Pub. L. 93–596 substituted "Patent and Trademark Office" for "Patent Office".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2011 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after that effective date, see section 20(l) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 2 of this title.
Effective Date of 1975 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 93–596 effective Jan. 2, 1975, see section 4 of Pub. L. 93–596, set out as a note under section 1111 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.