FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 29
Injunction
35 U.S.C. § 283
Title35 — Patents
Chapter29 — REMEDIES FOR INFRINGEMENT OF PATENT, AND OTHER ACTIONS
This text of 35 U.S.C. § 283 (Injunction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
35 U.S.C. § 283.
Text
The several courts having jurisdiction of cases under this title may grant injunctions in accordance with the principles of equity to prevent the violation of any right secured by patent, on such terms as the court deems reasonable.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Deepsouth Packing Co. v. Laitram Corp.
406 U.S. 518 (Supreme Court, 1972)
Smith International, Inc., a California Corporation v. Hughes Tool Company, a Delaware Corporation
718 F.2d 1573 (Federal Circuit, 1983)
H.H. Robertson, Company v. United Steel Deck, Inc. And Nicholas J. Bouras, Inc.
820 F.2d 384 (Federal Circuit, 1987)
Pfizer, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals Usa, Inc.
429 F.3d 1364 (Federal Circuit, 2005)
Curtiss-Wright Flow Control, Corp. v. Velan, Inc.
438 F.3d 1374 (Federal Circuit, 2006)
Ksm Fastening Systems, Inc. v. H.A. Jones Company, Inc. And Erico Jones Company
776 F.2d 1522 (Federal Circuit, 1985)
Abbott Laboratories v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
452 F.3d 1331 (Federal Circuit, 2006)
Perfect 10, Inc. v. Google, Inc.
653 F.3d 976 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Motorola, Inc. v. The United States
729 F.2d 765 (Federal Circuit, 1984)
Amstar Corp. v. Envirotech Corp.
823 F.2d 1538 (Federal Circuit, 1987)
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. v. Reichhold Chemicals, Inc.
755 F.2d 1559 (Federal Circuit, 1985)
Spine Solutions, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
620 F.3d 1305 (Federal Circuit, 2010)
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Smith
959 F.2d 936 (Federal Circuit, 1992)
Datascope Corporation v. Kontron Incorporated
786 F.2d 398 (Federal Circuit, 1986)
Windsurfing International, Inc. v. AMF, Inc.
782 F.2d 995 (Federal Circuit, 1986)
Carborundum Co. v. Molten Metal Equipment Innovations, Inc.
72 F.3d 872 (Federal Circuit, 1995)
Paper Converting MacHine Company v. Magna-Graphics Corporation
680 F.2d 483 (Seventh Circuit, 1982)
Mobil Oil Corporation v. WR Grace & Company
367 F. Supp. 207 (D. Connecticut, 1973)
International Rectifier Corp. v. Samsung Electronics Co.
361 F.3d 1355 (Federal Circuit, 2004)
Masimo Corp. v. Mallinckrodt Inc.
18 F. App'x 852 (Federal Circuit, 2001)
Source Credit
History
(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 812.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §70, part (R.S. 4921, amended (1) Mar. 3, 1897, ch. 391, §6, 29 Stat. 694, (2) Feb. 18, 1922, ch. 58, §8, 42 Stat. 392, (3) Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 726, §1, 60 Stat. 778).
This section is the same as the provision which opens R.S. 4921 with minor changes in language.
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §70, part (R.S. 4921, amended (1) Mar. 3, 1897, ch. 391, §6, 29 Stat. 694, (2) Feb. 18, 1922, ch. 58, §8, 42 Stat. 392, (3) Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 726, §1, 60 Stat. 778).
This section is the same as the provision which opens R.S. 4921 with minor changes in language.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
35 U.S.C. § 283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/35/283.