FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 2
Effect of defective execution
35 U.S.C. § 26
Title35 — Patents
Chapter2 — PROCEEDINGS IN THE PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
This text of 35 U.S.C. § 26 (Effect of defective execution) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
35 U.S.C. § 26.
Text
Any document to be filed in the Patent and Trademark Office and which is required by any law, rule, or other regulation to be executed in a specified manner may be provisionally accepted by the Director despite a defective execution, provided a properly executed document is submitted within such time as may be prescribed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jan Gerritsen and Johannes C.J. Aerts v. Shoji Shirai, Masakzu Fukushima, Satoru Miyamoto and Masahiro Miyazaki
979 F.2d 1524 (Federal Circuit, 1992)
Dominique Dubost v. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
777 F.2d 1561 (Federal Circuit, 1985)
In Re Jack G. Makari
708 F.2d 709 (Federal Circuit, 1983)
A. F. Stoddard & Company, Ltd. v. C. Marshall Dann, Commissioner of Patents
564 F.2d 556 (D.C. Circuit, 1977)
In Re Richard N. Bennett
766 F.2d 524 (Federal Circuit, 1985)
Virginia Innovation Sciences, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.
11 F. Supp. 3d 622 (E.D. Virginia, 2014)
Schenley Industries, Inc. v. E. Martinoni Company, Joseph S. Finch and Company v. E. Martinoni Company
408 F.2d 1049 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1969)
Sturzinger v. Commissioner of Patents
377 F. Supp. 1284 (District of Columbia, 1974)
In re Precious Diamonds, Inc.
635 F.2d 845 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1980)
R.N Nehushtan Trust Ltd. v. Apple Inc.
(N.D. California, 2022)
Dodocase VR, Inc. v. Merchsource, LLC
(N.D. California, 2020)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 88–292, §1, Mar. 26, 1964, 78 Stat. 171; amended Pub. L. 93–596, §1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1949; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(a)(10)(A)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–582; Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, §13206(b)(1)(B), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1906.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2002—Pub. L. 107–273 made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106–113. See 1999 Amendment note below.
1999—Pub. L. 106–113, as amended by Pub. L. 107–273, substituted "Director" for "Commissioner".
1975—Pub. L. 93–596 substituted "Patent and Trademark Office" for "Patent Office".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1999 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.
Effective Date of 1975 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 93–596 effective Jan. 2, 1975, see section 4 of Pub. L. 93–596, set out as a note under section 1111 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
Amendments
2002—Pub. L. 107–273 made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106–113. See 1999 Amendment note below.
1999—Pub. L. 106–113, as amended by Pub. L. 107–273, substituted "Director" for "Commissioner".
1975—Pub. L. 93–596 substituted "Patent and Trademark Office" for "Patent Office".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1999 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.
Effective Date of 1975 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 93–596 effective Jan. 2, 1975, see section 4 of Pub. L. 93–596, set out as a note under section 1111 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
35 U.S.C. § 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/35/26.