FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 25
Certificate of correction of applicant's mistake
35 U.S.C. § 255
Title35 — Patents
Chapter25 — AMENDMENT AND CORRECTION OF PATENTS
This text of 35 U.S.C. § 255 (Certificate of correction of applicant's mistake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
35 U.S.C. § 255.
Text
Whenever a mistake of a clerical or typographical nature, or of minor character, which was not the fault of the Patent and Trademark Office, appears in a patent and a showing has been made that such mistake occurred in good faith, the Director may, upon payment of the required fee, issue a certificate of correction, if the correction does not involve such changes in the patent as would constitute new matter or would require re-examination. Such patent, together with the certificate, shall have the same effect and operation in law on the trial of actions for causes thereafter arising as if the same had been originally issued in such corrected form.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Genentech, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Company, and the Regents of the University of California
998 F.2d 931 (Federal Circuit, 1993)
Superior Fireplace Company v. The Majestic Products Company and Vermont Castings, Inc., Defendants-Cross
270 F.3d 1358 (Federal Circuit, 2001)
Southwest Software, Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Harlequin Incorporated, Harlequin Limited, and Ecrm Trust
226 F.3d 1280 (Federal Circuit, 2000)
Eagle Iron Works v. McLanahan Corporation
429 F.2d 1375 (Third Circuit, 1970)
Struthers Patent Corp. v. Nestle Co., Inc.
558 F. Supp. 747 (D. New Jersey, 1981)
Forest Laboratories, Inc. v. Ivax Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
438 F. Supp. 2d 479 (D. Delaware, 2006)
Carotek, Inc. v. Kobayashi Ventures, LLC
875 F. Supp. 2d 313 (S.D. New York, 2012)
Medrad, Inc. v. Tyco Healthcare Group Lp
466 F.3d 1047 (Federal Circuit, 2006)
Bayer Ag and Bayer Corporation v. Carlsbad Technology, Inc.
298 F.3d 1377 (Federal Circuit, 2002)
Pfizer Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.
882 F. Supp. 2d 643 (D. Delaware, 2012)
Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Hospira, Inc.
75 F. Supp. 3d 641 (D. Delaware, 2014)
Hallmark Cards, Inc. v. Lehman
959 F. Supp. 539 (District of Columbia, 1997)
Zenith Controls, Inc. v. Automatic Switch Co.
648 F. Supp. 1497 (N.D. Illinois, 1986)
Barry v. Medtronic, Inc.
245 F. Supp. 3d 793 (E.D. Texas, 2017)
Word to Info, Inc. v. Google Inc.
140 F. Supp. 3d 986 (N.D. California, 2015)
Sargent-Welch Scientific Co. v. J/B Industries, Inc.
496 F. Supp. 972 (N.D. Illinois, 1980)
Eagle Iron Works v. McLanahan Corp.
303 F. Supp. 1029 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1969)
In re AndroGel Antitrust Litigation (No. II)
888 F. Supp. 2d 1336 (N.D. Georgia, 2012)
Bruker Spatial Biology, Inc. v. 10X Genomics, Inc.
(D. Delaware, 2024)
10X Genomics, Inc. v. Vizgen, Inc.
(D. Delaware, 2024)
Source Credit
History
(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 809; Pub. L. 93–596, §1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1949; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(a)(10)(A)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–582; Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, §13206(b)(1)(B), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1906.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
This section providing for the correction of minor clerical errors made by the applicant, is new and follows a similar provision in the trade-mark law, 15 U.S.C., 1946 ed., §1057(g).
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2002—Pub. L. 107–273 made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106–113. See 1999 Amendment note below.
1999—Pub. L. 106–113, as amended by Pub. L. 107–273, substituted "Director" for "Commissioner".
1975—Pub. L. 93–596 substituted "Patent and Trademark Office" for "Patent Office".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1999 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.
Effective Date of 1975 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 93–596 effective Jan. 2, 1975, see section 4 of Pub. L. 93–596, set out as a note under section 1111 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
This section providing for the correction of minor clerical errors made by the applicant, is new and follows a similar provision in the trade-mark law, 15 U.S.C., 1946 ed., §1057(g).
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2002—Pub. L. 107–273 made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106–113. See 1999 Amendment note below.
1999—Pub. L. 106–113, as amended by Pub. L. 107–273, substituted "Director" for "Commissioner".
1975—Pub. L. 93–596 substituted "Patent and Trademark Office" for "Patent Office".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1999 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.
Effective Date of 1975 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 93–596 effective Jan. 2, 1975, see section 4 of Pub. L. 93–596, set out as a note under section 1111 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
35 U.S.C. § 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/35/255.