FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 25
Certificate of correction of Patent and Trademark Office mistake
35 U.S.C. § 254
Title35 — Patents
Chapter25 — AMENDMENT AND CORRECTION OF PATENTS
This text of 35 U.S.C. § 254 (Certificate of correction of Patent and Trademark Office mistake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
35 U.S.C. § 254.
Text
Whenever a mistake in a patent, incurred through the fault of the Patent and Trademark Office, is clearly disclosed by the records of the Office, the Director may issue a certificate of correction stating the fact and nature of such mistake, under seal, without charge, to be recorded in the records of patents. A printed copy thereof shall be attached to each printed copy of the patent, and such certificate shall be considered as part of the original patent. Every such patent, together with such certificate, shall have the same effect and operation in law on the trial of actions for causes thereafter arising as if the same had been originally issued in such corrected form. The Director may issue a corrected patent without charge in lieu of and with like effect as a certificate of correction
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Superior Fireplace Company v. The Majestic Products Company and Vermont Castings, Inc., Defendants-Cross
270 F.3d 1358 (Federal Circuit, 2001)
Southwest Software, Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Harlequin Incorporated, Harlequin Limited, and Ecrm Trust
226 F.3d 1280 (Federal Circuit, 2000)
CBT FLINT PARTNERS, LLC v. Return Path, Inc.
654 F.3d 1353 (Federal Circuit, 2011)
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. MacDermid Printing Solutions, LLC
525 F.3d 1353 (Federal Circuit, 2008)
Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc.
345 F.3d 1318 (Federal Circuit, 2003)
Lamoureux v. AnazaoHealth Corp.
250 F.R.D. 100 (D. Connecticut, 2008)
Breed v. Hughes Aircraft Co.
253 F.3d 1173 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
Carotek, Inc. v. Kobayashi Ventures, LLC
875 F. Supp. 2d 313 (S.D. New York, 2012)
Intel Corp. v. Negotiated Data Solutions, Inc.
703 F.3d 1360 (Federal Circuit, 2012)
In re Hornback
20 F. App'x 846 (Federal Circuit, 2001)
Word to Info, Inc. v. Google Inc.
140 F. Supp. 3d 986 (N.D. California, 2015)
Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. v. Alcon Inc.
361 F. Supp. 2d 370 (D. Delaware, 2005)
Radar Industries, Inc. v. Cleveland Die & Manufacturing Co.
632 F. Supp. 2d 686 (E.D. Michigan, 2009)
Stmicroelectronics, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc.
327 F. Supp. 2d 687 (E.D. Texas, 2004)
S.O.I.TEC Silicon on Insulator Technologies v. MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc.
745 F. Supp. 2d 489 (D. Delaware, 2010)
Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.
544 F. Supp. 2d 1080 (S.D. California, 2008)
Intel Corp. v. ALTIMA COMMUNICATIONS INC.
275 F. Supp. 2d 1236 (E.D. California, 2003)
Bombardier Recreational Products, Inc v. Arctic Cat, Inc
(D. Minnesota, 2018)
In Re Ho Keung Tse
552 F. App'x 979 (Federal Circuit, 2014)
Beacon Navigation GmbH v. Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
(E.D. Michigan, 2023)
Source Credit
History
(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 809; Pub. L. 93–596, §1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1949; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(a)(10)(A)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–582; Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, §13206(b)(1)(B), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1906.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §88 (Mar. 4, 1925, ch. 535, §1, 43 Stat. 1268).
The last sentence of the present section is omitted as obsolete. A sentence is added similar to a provision in the corresponding section in the trade-mark law, 15 U.S.C., 1946 ed., §1057(f), and provides that the Commissioner may issue a corrected patent instead of a certificate of correction.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2002—Pub. L. 107–273 made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106–113. See 1999 Amendment note below.
1999—Pub. L. 106–113, as amended by Pub. L. 107–273, substituted "Director" for "Commissioner" in two places.
1975—Pub. L. 93–596 substituted "Patent and Trademark Office" for "Patent Office" in section catchline and text.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1999 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.
Effective Date of 1975 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 93–596 effective Jan. 2, 1975, see section 4 of Pub. L. 93–596, set out as a note under section 1111 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §88 (Mar. 4, 1925, ch. 535, §1, 43 Stat. 1268).
The last sentence of the present section is omitted as obsolete. A sentence is added similar to a provision in the corresponding section in the trade-mark law, 15 U.S.C., 1946 ed., §1057(f), and provides that the Commissioner may issue a corrected patent instead of a certificate of correction.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2002—Pub. L. 107–273 made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106–113. See 1999 Amendment note below.
1999—Pub. L. 106–113, as amended by Pub. L. 107–273, substituted "Director" for "Commissioner" in two places.
1975—Pub. L. 93–596 substituted "Patent and Trademark Office" for "Patent Office" in section catchline and text.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1999 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.
Effective Date of 1975 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 93–596 effective Jan. 2, 1975, see section 4 of Pub. L. 93–596, set out as a note under section 1111 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
35 U.S.C. § 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/35/254.