FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 17

Filing of application in foreign country

35 U.S.C. § 184
Title35Patents
Chapter17 — SECRECY OF CERTAIN INVENTIONS AND FILING APPLICATIONS IN FOREIGN COUNTRY

This text of 35 U.S.C. § 184 (Filing of application in foreign country) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
35 U.S.C. § 184.

Text

(a)Filing in Foreign Country.—Except when authorized by a license obtained from the Commissioner of Patents a person shall not file or cause or authorize to be filed in any foreign country prior to six months after filing in the United States an application for patent or for the registration of a utility model, industrial design, or model in respect of an invention made in this country. A license shall not be granted with respect to an invention subject to an order issued by the Commissioner of Patents pursuant to section 181 without the concurrence of the head of the departments and the chief officers of the agencies who caused the order to be issued. The license may be granted retroactively where an application has been filed abroad through error and the application does not disclose an

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shelco, Inc. v. Dow Chemical Co.
466 F.2d 613 (Seventh Circuit, 1972)
22 case citations
General Instrument Corporation v. Hughes Aircraft Company
399 F.2d 373 (First Circuit, 1968)
20 case citations
Transitron Electronic Corp. v. Hughes Aircraft Co.
487 F. Supp. 885 (D. Massachusetts, 1980)
12 case citations
Shelco, Inc. v. Dow Chemical Company
322 F. Supp. 485 (N.D. Illinois, 1970)
12 case citations
In re Sarkar
575 F.2d 870 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1978)
11 case citations
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Norton Company
240 F. Supp. 150 (N.D. Ohio, 1965)
9 case citations
Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp. v. Nordson Corporation
293 F. Supp. 448 (N.D. Illinois, 1968)
9 case citations
Barr Rubber Products Company v. Sun Rubber Company
253 F. Supp. 12 (S.D. New York, 1966)
8 case citations
Blake v. Bassick Company
245 F. Supp. 635 (N.D. Illinois, 1965)
8 case citations
Stauffer Chemical Co. v. Monsanto Co.
623 F. Supp. 148 (E.D. Missouri, 1985)
4 case citations
In re Gaertner
604 F.2d 1348 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1979)
4 case citations
Nitto Boseki Co., Ltd. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas
589 F. Supp. 527 (D. Delaware, 1984)
3 case citations
Torin Corp. v. Philips Industries, Inc.
89 F.R.D. 346 (S.D. Ohio, 1981)
2 case citations
Control Systems Research, Inc. v. Aerotech, Inc.
429 F. Supp. 914 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1977)
2 case citations
Blake v. Bassick Co.
262 F. Supp. 910 (N.D. Illinois, 1967)
2 case citations
Twin Disc, Inc. v. United States
10 Cl. Ct. 713 (Court of Claims, 1986)
2 case citations

Source Credit

History

(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 807; Pub. L. 100–418, title IX, §9101(b)(1), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1567; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(a)(10)(B)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–582; Pub. L. 112–29, §20(b), (j), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 333, 335.)

Editorial Notes

Historical and Revision Notes
Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §154 (Feb. 1, 1952, ch. 4, §4, 66 Stat. 5).
Language is changed.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2011—Pub. L. 112–29 designated first to third pars. as subsecs. (a) to (c), respectively, inserted headings, in subsec. (a), struck out "of this title" after "181" in two places and struck out "and without deceptive intent" after "through error", and, in subsec. (c), struck out "of this title" after "under section 181" in first sentence.
1999—Pub. L. 106–113 substituted "Commissioner of Patents" for "Commissioner" two places in first par.
1988—Pub. L. 100–418, §9101(b)(1)(A), substituted "filed abroad through error and without deceptive intent" for "inadvertently filed abroad" in first par.
Pub. L. 100–418, §9101(b)(1)(B), added third par. relating to scope of a license.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2011 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after that effective date, see section 20(l) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 2 of this title.

Effective Date of 1999 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.

Effective Date of 1988 Amendment
Pub. L. 100–418, title IX, §9101(d), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1568, provided that:
"(1) Subject to paragraphs (2), (3), and (4) of this subsection, the amendments made by this section [amending sections 184 to 186 of this title] shall apply to all United States patents granted before, on, or after the date of enactment of this section [Aug. 23, 1988], to all applications for United States patents pending on or filed after such date of enactment, and to all licenses under section 184 granted before, on, or after the date of enactment of this section.
"(2) The amendments made by this section shall not affect any final decision made by a court or the Patent and Trademark Office before the date of enactment of this section [Aug. 23, 1988] with respect to a patent or application for patent, if no appeal from such decision is pending and the time for filing an appeal has expired.
"(3) No United States patent granted before the date of enactment of this section [Aug. 23, 1988] shall abridge or affect the right of any person or his successors in business who made, purchased, or used, prior to such date of enactment, anything protected by the patent, to continue the use of, or to sell to others to be used or sold, the specific thing so made, purchased, or used, if the patent claims were invalid or otherwise unenforceable on a ground obviated by this section and the person made, purchased, or used the specific thing in reasonable reliance on such invalidity or unenforceability. If a person reasonably relied on such invalidity or unenforceability, the court before which such matter is in question may provide for the continued manufacture, use, or sale of the thing made, purchased, or used as specified, or for the manufacture, use, or sale of which substantial preparation was made before the date of enactment of this section, and it may also provide for the continued practice of any process practiced, or for the practice of which substantial preparation was made, prior to the date of enactment of this section, to the extent and under such terms as the court deems equitable for the protection of investments made or business commenced before such date of enactment.
"(4) The amendments made by this section shall not affect the right of any party in any case pending in court on the date of enactment of this section [Aug. 23, 1988] to have its rights or liabilities—
"(A) under any patent before the court, or
"(B) under any patent granted after such date of enactment which is related to the patent before the court by deriving priority rights under section 120 or 121 of title 35, United States Code, from a patent or an application for patent common to both patents,
determined on the basis of the substantive law in effect before the date of enactment of this section."

Promulgation of Regulations
Pub. L. 100–418, title IX, §9101(c), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1568, directed Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks to prescribe such regulations as necessary to implement the amendments made by section 9101 (amending sections 184 to 186 of this title).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 U.S.C. § 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/35/184.